Ruby: I think I would have to disagree with your last two sentences too as
they come across as rather fundamentalist. A disciplined environment has
been found to work very well for reocvoring drug addicts and so long as
they remain within those confines they do very well. there are other
groups as will that do with better in more disciplined environments - at
school for example.
WTF? Here are my "last two sentences":
- Too little strictness never leads to tragedies such as Jonestown.
Fundamentalist extremism of all sorts are malignant cancers of the soul
and psyche.
How is either of these sentences "fundamentalist"? And what do you even mean by that?
In my last sentence, I explicitly comment on my conclusions about "Fundamentalist extremism" and its effects on individuals. It is not an ideological statement of belief.
The first of the two sentences is addressing Iannoccone's "that too much strictness causes just as much harm as too little" with which I disagree.
Finally, your comments about "a disciplined environment" and its benefits are true, but have nothing to do with fundamentalist extremism. You completely changed the subject. I think you are confusing discipline with fundamentalism and extremist ideologies. They are not the same, not at all.