The two articles in the October and November 2011 WT were fantastic, they helped free 2+2=5 of his long held religious superstitions.
Scholar, why do you want to discredit your holy book by trying to go against the overwhelming evidence? Do you prefer that the bible is in clear conflict with the thousands of pieces of evidence that form the foundation of a widely accepted date in history?
The fact is the bible is in harmony with the historic evidence. It has been explained here and elsewhere many times.
It is obvious to everyone reading this, that the only reason you cling to 607, is the implications it has to your entire belief system (1914). It's a hard pill to swallow. It just requires some honesty on your part.
Some religious quacks in the 1800's were off track with prophetic speculation, and devised ways to attract attention to their published works by speculating on the scriptures with crazy date setting and numerology, all garbage. A few people in New York are still doing it. Just deal with it and move on.