In regard to actually what happened to Morris. . .
I've been curious if he actually did have to step down because of medical reasons, i.e. he is so yellow from cirrhosis they had to hide him away.
that was click bait.
did it work?
https://youtu.be/_spl7to0m3y?si=gujblhtzkpy0fvzz .
In regard to actually what happened to Morris. . .
I've been curious if he actually did have to step down because of medical reasons, i.e. he is so yellow from cirrhosis they had to hide him away.
that was click bait.
did it work?
https://youtu.be/_spl7to0m3y?si=gujblhtzkpy0fvzz .
You got, got. That was click bait. Did it work?
https://youtu.be/_spl7to0m3y?si=xsydtlmsp5ncenlc .
for those that like to nerd out over jw history and theology.
you will probably find this interesting..
https://youtu.be/_SPL7To0M3Y?si=XsyDTLmsp5NcenlC
For those that like to nerd out over JW history and theology. You will probably find this interesting.
march 3-9 theocratic school material is something else.. i fully get that there are 2 major sides of thinking regarding that topic.
but really from their own lying mouths it was a personal decision that should have been respected.
this was not reality.
what is in this material?
i don’t know a lot about james penton but i think he deserves a better thread than the one currently on offer.
james penton, who died recently, grew up in a jw family in canada and served as an elder.
unusually for a jw, he studied liberal arts at university and became a history professor.
Rest well Jim! hope to see you in the Kingdom.
bulletin (apple ios users only).
these secular sources and evidence suggest that the destruction of jerusalem by babylon took place in 537 bce, not 607 bce as jehovah's witnesses believe.. .
these problems with the watchtower society's reasoning suggest that their interpretation of the bible and the date of the destruction of jerusalem by babylon is incorrect.. .
so the app is off more than the JWs chronology??
its not 537. . .
looking for references that talk about witnesses not being able to hold any private interpretation or belief that isn't in line with official doctrine.
.
i know i've seen them before but of course now i can't find any of the more in your face statements..
Thanks to everyone who gave relevant links and sources!!
looking for references that talk about witnesses not being able to hold any private interpretation or belief that isn't in line with official doctrine.
.
i know i've seen them before but of course now i can't find any of the more in your face statements..
Can people not read?
I am asking for quotes from the organizations publications, where they spay that individual JWs should not hold beliefs other than what the organization teaches even if they keep it private.
help would be appreciated
looking for references that talk about witnesses not being able to hold any private interpretation or belief that isn't in line with official doctrine.
.
i know i've seen them before but of course now i can't find any of the more in your face statements..
thats super helpful thanks
looking for references that talk about witnesses not being able to hold any private interpretation or belief that isn't in line with official doctrine.
.
i know i've seen them before but of course now i can't find any of the more in your face statements..
Looking for references that talk about witnesses not being able to hold any private interpretation or belief that isn't in line with official doctrine.
I know I've seen them before but of course now I can't find any of the more in your face statements.