Skedaddle

Joined

• started 3 topics
• posted 225 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Skedaddle

• 
  14

  Watch Tower's ridiculous Defence in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice queen’s bench division .

  frank kofi otuo .

  jonathan david morley .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  He's representing himself and taking the Watchtower on human rights legislation??? Whoohooooo!!! I love this guy!
• 
  14

  Watch Tower's ridiculous Defence in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice queen’s bench division .

  frank kofi otuo .

  jonathan david morley .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  You can see how the Branch is trying to seperate itself from the congregation legally. There's enough legal documents and literature to establish solid evidence to squash this.

  The human rights sections - Hopefully the lawyer is aware of the current case that's going on with the European court regarding shunning. There's enough magazines which establishes the truth.

  Also, the ''charitable status'' is under scrutiny by the UK Charity Commission at present. So it might not be ''recognized'' with such a prestigious title for too much longer.

  I think if the solicitor can establish, with the use of the JW's own literature, their real proceedures of disfellowshipping and shunning and witness statements are provided as proof, it should be a home run.

  This case looks like it's in the bag. By announcing disfellowshipping from the platform, they slandered his name. I hope the claimant doesn't settle out of court... the ruling in court is needed so others come forward for the shunning because human rights win will defo be all over the media!
• 
  14

  Watch Tower's ridiculous Defence in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice queen’s bench division .

  frank kofi otuo .

  jonathan david morley .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  I wasn't aware of any previous info on this case so was taking it as is. Sorry nelim! My apologies! Cheers akromo.
• 
  10

  The Particulars of Claim in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice claimno: hq14d02898 .

  queens bench division.

  1. this is a claim in slander against the first and second defendant..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  @Akromo - I've only read the two threads you've posted today but in my opinion the Watchtower is screwed. The Claimants lawyer can nail this if he knows what weapons to use.
• 
  10

  The Particulars of Claim in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice claimno: hq14d02898 .

  queens bench division.

  1. this is a claim in slander against the first and second defendant..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  @dot - yes it was 20 years ago or so. I'm going to the other thread to respond further.
• 
  14

  Watch Tower's ridiculous Defence in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice queen’s bench division .

  frank kofi otuo .

  jonathan david morley .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  @nelim, it doesn't speak of what evidence they based the disfellowshippng on as it is not part of the case. I would suggest that they would have had two witnesses or, maybe some kind of paperwork was provided as the second witness. I'm speculating, the point is, it's irrelevant to the case and that's why it isn't listed.
• 
  13

  Good article - Are Jehovah's Witnesses a religious Ponzi scheme?

  by defender of truth in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  www.the-newshub.com/general/are-jehovahs-witness-a-religious-ponzi-scheme

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  Wow, scathing! But, all true! Thanks for that DOT. They are a ponzi, pyramid scheme. An international one! They are a fraud!
• 
  10

  The Particulars of Claim in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

  by akromo in

  1. social
  2. current

  in the high court of justice claimno: hq14d02898 .

  queens bench division.

  1. this is a claim in slander against the first and second defendant..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  Jeff you're right, the lawyer representing would have asked those questions first. I think we know the police weren't called but the lawyer on hearing this would know he has a slam-dunk case. No police investigation but then executing punishment... game over.

  I took a JW to court years ago in a very similar scenario and won the case. I was innocent. There were others involved who didn't want to go to court but were innocent of the accusation also and the judge hinted to open more cases for the others because there had been no legal investigation done by the police and therefore it was an open and shut case.

  They're screwed!

  This case could be landmark - human rights act is up in two sections. If they win on either or both of them, this could open a floodgate for anyone who's being shunned.
• 
  23

  Any other teenagers on here?

  by BlackWolf in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i'm 16 and it seems like most the people on this forum are adults.

  i would think since most teenagers have tablets/smartphones there would be more on here but maybe not?

  it would be nice to meet some other young people.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  Ah, I see what you did there with your handle - Disillusioned2, Dis3. Cute!

  We should bump this thread to catch more friends for you guys. When I remember I'll bump it for you. You guys should do the same.

  Calling all teenagers - introduce yourselves!
• 
  21

  Whats the one thing

  by MrTheocratic in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  jw's are constantly trying to prove they have the truth.

  they always point to matthew 24:14 and say "who is accomplishing this work today?

  this proves we have the truth and gods backing".. for those of us in this community looking from the other side what is one thing that proves to you that this organization does not have gods backing?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Skedaddle

  What is one thing that proves to you that this organization does not have Gods backing?

  One thing? This needs a rant...

  God doesn't need a publishing company printing literature that people in some way have to pay for or a property empire or an organization that requires cash contributions. God wants life to live! Being loving, kind, respectful and honest is free and is in harmony with survival and encourages others to reflect your actions leading to peace, balance and harmony - the state of optimal progression for life.

  Most religions are a manmade guilt trip to control and gather money and power. If the witnesses used their collective contributions to go out and feed people, house people, bring water, provide clothing, provide education, provide companionship to people who are alone before talking about God, their actions would speak louder than any word uttered from their mouths. God supports that. Actions.
  

  Instead they are a disgraceful, disgusting, pius, pompous, self-righteous, unloving, lazy, greedy, parasitic organization. Their works are dead! Sitting on your back-side and occassionally distributing literature and attending meetings while you wait for the end of the world is of what use? When you learn what a pyramid scheme is, it's not hard to see the truth of the Watchtower. It curtails otherwise loving members into ignorant, lazy, brainwashed, robots who have no use and contribute nothing positive, to society - they exist merely as a cash machine to the org. It's a parasitic organization that causes the opposite of what it professes to be. A cancer to society. It dishes out fear and rules with an iron-fist. No wonder it's members are depressed and their energy is negative. The perfect, ignorant slave needing a master (in the new world order - there's a clue).

  That's what the little voice of doubt inside your head knows - it's not Satan, it's your subconscious telling you to wake-up and live, help, contribute something, bring happiness!

  Provided for all is this beautiful world and universe to discover and interact with, in all it's glory and intricate detail and endless beauty and humankind is journeying to find that optimum state of harmonizing with it but the witnesses decide to sit on their backsides and say, ''we'll wait this one out!''

  God's backing? Nobody backs a dead horse!