I’ve found that a Christian who understands these things can actually put on the evolutionist’s glasses (without accepting the presuppositions as true) and understand how they look at evidence. However, for a number of reasons, including spiritual ones, a non-Christian usually can’t put on the Christian’s glasses—unless they recognize the presuppositional nature of the battle and are thus beginning to question their own presuppositions.
Ha this statement is less of a presupposition and more of a presumption. In fact, I have worn both glasses. I raised with all the Christian 'presuppositions' as you say. But facts are facts. They are not open to interpretation, if they were then by defintion they are not facts! You are confusing facts with conclusions.
Your Christian "glasses" seem to operate more as "blinders" because you approach every bit of evidence with the intention of applying it to your belief system. You try to "interpret" facts, ie. speculate on supplemental reasons how the 'fact' can fit into your paradigm. I shed my blinders and let the evidence speak for itself. If the evidence does not fit into my current belief system, then that system must be altered, not the evidence. I am free to change my belief based on new information, you are a enslaved to a firmly entrenched and unyielding belief system that will not allow you to see the world for what it is.