Hello, Sean. I'd say 'welcome to the board' but you've been here longer 'n me!
My father would agree with you, seeing very little integrity in the human race in general.
Your father is a realist, imo. Very little integrity exists, only a mob mentality or, saying it more gently, a lemming mentality... an over-riding desire to be accepted, to follow, to not make waves. All of these behaviors stem, imo, from a lack of willingness to think for oneself.
While I agree that those without integrity get most of the attention I cannot agree that this reveals a lack of integrity in general. Doesn't it have more to do with personality and opportunity than actual moral integrity?
Maximus said it well when he said that he was stunned when no one raised a voice when great men (Ed and Ray) where treated so shabbily after decades of slendid service. No doubt many of those silent voices knew that the ugliness visited upon those fine people was not justified, but they remained silent. It's my contention that if they were indeed good people, they would have spoken up -- said something, done something -- if not for their friends who they'd worked with side by side for decades, then for the sake of truth and what was/is fair and just. That they didn't points to a severe character flaw. With friends like them...
Also to be considered is fear. It is hard for many good people to face their fears. They may object to the organization but are afraid to face consequences of revolt. I'm not ready to cast the brand of "gutless" and "lacking in integrity" on these people. I know what it's like when you have family in and you're afraid you will lose them if you speak out. You may be willing to risk it personally. But that does not in itself make you a man of integrity.
I am acquainted with the reality of risk... of loosing the freedom to be in my mother's company. I know others in my situation as well. Balancing my love for my family who are still in with an equal (greater?) love of universal truth is not easy and I don't mean to make it sound that way. Yet, the example that others have set when it comes to personal sacrifice for the sake of real truth I do not ignore. I will not ignore.
As far as their being "afraid to face consequences" I say (excuse my French) "bullshit." I never held a position in a congregation above aux. pioneer. A big part of that is due to my inability to kiss ass. I told men, all of them from DO on down, exactly what I thought. So, I paid the price of never holding an office. Was the price overwhelming? Too high? I don't think so.
After decades of association, Bill B. discovered a heinous truth about a WTS policy. Virtue moved him to 'step down.' Could others do the same? I think so. Why don't they? And if not 'step down,' why don't they at least become more vocal? Because they are afraid? Damn right. Afraid of loosing their position. Their freakin' position as a low-level flunky in an evil religion is more important than standing up for what's really. Should my respect for such people be higher than it is? Should I cut them some slack, be more understanding? I don't think so.
Think please before you open your mouth to judge.
I do and I will. You do the same. Btw, I don't consider what I've done judging. I haven't 'judged' anyone.
tj