1935?... and propaganda? I would be cautious here: perhaps it was more a reaction to the "propaganda" of Hitler's Germany and fascist Italy, or we could talk about Bolshevik Russia (there was communist "agitation" in Russia).
Posts by PetrW
-
7The org: Coal calling the kettle black! #2
by BoogerMan in"the generally accepted definition of propaganda is this: an organization for the propagation of a doctrine or system, the purpose of which is to cause the membership of the system or organization to increase or enlarge.
religious organizations engage in propaganda, because each system of religion tries to increase its membership.
the work of jehovah’s witnesses for his kingdom is entirely a different matter.
-
-
PetrW
-
11
Michael died twice for JW's sins.
by moomanchu inonce when jehovah turned him into a sperm and once when the romans crucified him.. technically sperm is still alive when used for invitro fertilization.
then again is sleeping in a tomb for a few hours really dead ?.
forget it, no one died for jw's sins.
-
-
PetrW
@moomanchu
Technically sperm is still alive when used for invitro fertilization. Then again is sleeping in a tomb for a few hours really dead ?
***
Technically...Mary could have been - in modern terms - a surrogate mother. Something about this is suggested by the text John 1:13, where it is written that he was not born of blood, nor of the will of the flesh or of man. We don't know at what stage of development this embryo was "inserted" into the body, and we don't know exactly if Mary contributed her genetic "material" to the development of the fetus. We only know that she is designated as the mother.
-
9
Any advice for my situation?
by rathernotsay inhey, this community was so helpful last time i didnt know how to handle a situation years ago, and here i am all theae years later back on here asking for some advice again on how to handle a certain situation with my kids.
little bit of backstory.. i'm an non jw, been divorced from my ex wife (practicing jw) for about 6 years now.
have 3 kids 7, 10, 13. .
-
-
PetrW
I think it's difficult to give you advice. I only know about your children's situation in your ex-wife's new family from your description. Your children would also have to express themselves directly, as well as the new partner and his children. This is all important information that is missing.
Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's wrong. Children can temporarily experience discomfort and still be happy. It really depends on what the actual situation is in getting the six children together. And there are bound to be problems, even if they live in a big house.
I would maintain contact, but I would encourage your own children to acknowledge the new reality, rather than you - well-meaning - comforting your children, undermining the authority of your ex-wife's new partner. He will also have to raise his voice to your children at some point, to decide that this or that ends or begins. And your children may not like that and will complain to you. But he may have been right at the time, which again, you don't know. Or he could have made a parenting mistake, just like you, but he'd be doubly responsible for one mistake...
That's why I think Sue was right: focus on your new family. Maintain good, trusting relationships with your children, but don't undermine the authority of the new parents. You need help, I think, because this is a very sensitive area.
After all, imagine the same interference in your new relationship, from your wife's ex-partner - if he were to send a lawyer to yours - as others advise you. It only exacerbates the situation...
"What you want people to do to you, you do to them", said a famous ancient philosopher.
It has almost nothing to do with JWs. Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, Hindus, Chinese Communists or atheists deal with the same family constellation.
-
28
The pushing berween the K of N and K of S
by Kosonen inthe brics summit was big this year.
new member states were added.
interesting that they call themselves the global south.
-
-
PetrW
@EP
EP: If Josephus recorded some of those events correctly in his histories after they happened, what of it? Does that negate that the prophecies were recorded in Daniel chapter 11? Not at all.
PW: The problem I see is that we rely on extra-biblical commentaries. It's the same as in another discussion when you deny the possibility of drawing from extra-biblical sources that Noah & Co. didn't live for hundreds of years.
I don't underestimate those sources, but I don't overestimate them either. I think your biblical thinking, unnecessarily heavily influenced by human traditions.
-
28
The pushing berween the K of N and K of S
by Kosonen inthe brics summit was big this year.
new member states were added.
interesting that they call themselves the global south.
-
-
PetrW
@EP
Yes, the story of John the Baptist is a familiar one. But what I wanted to emphasize is that he has acquired an extraordinary ability to see the symbols in the Law that are - as it were - "behind" the text. He saw the Spirit and not the letter of the Law. And I find something similar missing in the interpretations of Daniel. The interpretation of the first half of chapter 11 - as you accurately describe - is then based on historical sources like Josephus Flavius or the Maccabees and other extra-biblical literature. We can then say that the first half of Daniel 11 is interpreted by Josephus and not by the Bible.
This - in my opinion - needs to be changed. I've lived to see that for about 1700 years, a certain Hyppolitus of Rome and variants on his interpretation sufficed as a commentator on Daniel for Christians, but I don't want to live to see that for another 1700 years, it stays that way. It's time for a change! ✌️😁😁
On a more serious note: as you write I see it complicated => I'm trying to figure out the state of affairs and it's not good. The interpretation of Daniel will be and is easy if Jesus would give you a hint. I struggle to hear how He would say: Have you not read there and there and this and that.... But so far I know of no one who has been given that honor. Not even the false prophets who would know there or elsewhere and for us to go there are none or even few. No one wants to be a false prophet today either, humanity has become lazy...😎😁
-
7
IT'S OFFICIAL: Unbelief in WTBTS/JW's renders ANYONE as being anti-Christ
by BoogerMan init-1 p. 127 - "they may also claim to serve god but reject (don't serve) his representatives, his visible organization.
such ones willfully abandoning the christian congregation (the org) thereby become part of the “antichrist.”" .
-
-
PetrW
The book "Insight", we were all excited to see what wisdom there would be... A few years later, in my process of "dropping out", I once, sort of started looking on the CD, in the electronic version of "Insight", using a simple year search, for all the references to literature that the JWs had used. I typed in 192 and all the references with those numbers came up, of course there were other numbers for something else, but that's obvious to everyone. Well, the result was - I don't remember exactly - but most of the literature cited in this dictionary was from the years between, I don't really know, but late 19th century and early 20th century for sure. Of course, that's not necessarily entirely wrong - some of the more reputable works on biblical studies began to appear in the early 19th century - typically: Gesenius and his Hebrew-Aramaic Dictionary.
Although I don't remember all the details, it's been 20 years or more, then the entry, "Madness" and the justification for Nebuchadnezzar's alleged mental illness, is truly phenomenal. The JWs are not afraid - what they are not afraid of, they are probably downright proud of the fact that professional authorities agree with them when they refer to an 1818 French medical dictionary to describe "lycanthropy". Yes, 1818. Medicine hasn't changed since the end of the Napoleonic Wars.
Thus, you refer to reputable university professors who affirm the geocentric model of the universe...one only needs to look it up, in manuscripts, from the 1400s or 1600s.
*
I still wonder how apt the parable of the buried talent and the JWs is. They don't take advantage of the opportunities they have: time, money and people. "Bible students" don't have a complete commentary on the Bible even after 150 years. A demonstration of intellectual desperation was already described by R. Franz: when they wanted to compile an encyclopedia, the elders of the congregation started sending him clippings or excerpts from the Watchtower for each entry. No, these people were not and are not stupid. Under good leadership, with good motivation, time and money, a lot of work can be done. But that would require abandoning the dogmatism that only a small group of people have and can be right. That's why the reference to the medical dictionary from 1818 for a non-existent mental disorder remains with them to this day... so far it seems like a missed opportunity. I am not making a negative prognosis for the future: salvation history knows the case of Nineveh. So they still have time...
-
55
Trinity Statements in the Dead Sea Scrolls
by Sea Breeze indr. ken johnson has identified several statements in the dead sea scrolls that predict that god would visit the earth as a man... as the messiah.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljrfvytjhve&ab_channel=kenjohnson%28biblefacts%29 .
-
-
PetrW
@SB
I then based my decision to move forward with Jesus on the scripture where he said, "All power has been given me in Heaven and Earth."
PW: I agree with you I stayed in this position. As I wrote, I consider the Trinity to be superfluous to my faith (see Ockham's Razor).
But I, too, have seen a shift: I have stopped waging "battles" against Trinitarians. Rather, I have been pointing out the historical development of non-Trinitarianism*, especially in the 16th and 17th centuries, and that non-Trinitarians are not just and only JWs.
I don't then use being a non-trinitarian as a theological "stick" on others just because they don't profess exactly what I do. On the other hand, I also don't see the threat of ending up in the lake of fire if I don't confess the Trinity. I increase my chances of getting into the lake of fire by other activities...
* my wife and I even drove through a few have in Europe where anti-Trinitarians have left some mark to this day...
-
28
The pushing berween the K of N and K of S
by Kosonen inthe brics summit was big this year.
new member states were added.
interesting that they call themselves the global south.
-
-
PetrW
@EP
when Daniel recorded the angel's words, for instance that one beast stood for the king of Greece or that another one stood for a certain king, Daniel wasn't making historicized interpretations that lead to nowhere. The angel certainly wasn't manifesting exegetical arbitrariness.
PW: I think that's the biggest problem: Daniel received this information from an angel, or, it was communicated to him "in the language of angels" (1 Cor. 13:1). Technically, it was Hebrew or Aramaic, but the main problem is the method of communication. The angelic language is, in my opinion, highly symbolic speech and without "translation" into "human language", the information remains almost incomprehensible.
My explanation is as I have already written to you: Daniel's texts do not contain any precise time points, any time milestones, just the beginning of the narrative and the information that it refers to the end. So if the angel explains, for example, in Dan 8:20-21 what the ram (Medes and Persians) and the goat (Greek) mean, he also states that the vision refers to the end of time (Dan 8:19).
So I am faced with the problem of how to connect the events of the time of Alexander of Macedon and the year 2023...
I see the solution to this problem in trying to put myself in the position of the angel and his understanding of time. If it is also true for him that a day is like 1000 years and 1000 years like a day, then I also assume that he can talk about the Persians or Alexander of Macedon and link the two together. No past or present in human understanding plays much of a role there. If a Persian was swinging a sword in antiquity, then a "Persian" at the end of time will be swinging, say, a laser sword. From the position of an angel, time, motive, and the fact that Satan owns the world is most likely a completely identical situation.
Abstract and timeless thought operations with symbols that must correspond to God's intention, which we have difficulty reconstructing, exclude, in my opinion, the possibility of learning the language of angels*. The book of Daniel will remain sealed without God's help.
*In my opinion, for example, John the Baptist (in modern terms one would say: he had a genius ability) interpreted the Scriptures in exactly this way. How else would he have thought of "washing" people with water? That the Law is a shadow of things to come... he got the symbolism of the Law exactly right.
-
28
The pushing berween the K of N and K of S
by Kosonen inthe brics summit was big this year.
new member states were added.
interesting that they call themselves the global south.
-
-
PetrW
@Ray Frantz
I agree with you that this is a very difficult chapter. I see the main problem there is that no time frames are given. It is possible to infer length from the fact that one king succeeds another, but that doesn't rule out the possibility that changes could have taken place very quickly. Or: some events could have lasted longer, others shorter.
The only clue in most of Daniel's visions, is in the resemblance to a definite end. This would then mean that, for example, chapter 11 does not take up, say, 2500 years, but perhaps only a few decades, because it is supposed to end before a generation passes. If it were to take 2500 years, as EasyPrompt suggests, it would be such a super-overlapping generation 😎... But, these are just my thoughts, I'm not making it dogma.
More on Revelation: I think only an interpretation of Revelation that allows for general, timeless validity is correct. That interpretation must apply to either the 5th or 23rd century.
Example: if I argue that the two-horned beast, are - I'm deliberately overstating this now - the Berlin Philharmonic, then they didn't exist in the 5th century, and no one knows if they will in the 23rd century. The two-horned animal could be, for example, the Paris Philharmonic..😊😎
To me, the answer is hidden/revealed in the text of Revelation and especially in the New Testament. Staying with the two-horned animal, if it is identified as a false prophet, then it is good to look at who and under what circumstances was identified as a false prophet, false witness or antichrist (see for example Matt 7:15 or 2 Peter 2:1)
This leads to looking for the equivalent in the NT. I assume that the two horned animal is a symbol for the two high priests who form the horns and who condemned Christ, that the "body" is the Sanhedrin, that the eyes and ears of the animal, were the Pharisees who were constantly watching what the tribe was doing on the Sabbath or listening to Jesus speak. They were also the "feet" of the animal because they were constantly following him.
Knowing how such a two-horned animal treated Christ and the apostles, and the warning that false prophets would also come out of Christians, it is easy to understand that it doesn't matter what denomination, it will take the "flesh" of the two-horned animal. If in the 5th century, it was Catholics, then in the 23rd century it may be JWs. Who knows? 😁
The bottom line is that it's not names that are being sought, but roles and relationships. After all, as in the Sanhedrin they weren't all bad (see Joseph of Arimathea), it's not for us to make judgements. By what judgment do you judge...😎
That's how I think of it.
-
28
The pushing berween the K of N and K of S
by Kosonen inthe brics summit was big this year.
new member states were added.
interesting that they call themselves the global south.
-
-
PetrW
@SB
I haven't studied the consensus/difference between you and Hyppolite in detail. Only: when I read what all those Antiochus, Ptolemaic, or various Cleopatras were doing, I knew where the wind was blowing from.
I think there's still a lot of Hyppolite in you.