where is "Irak?"
Posts by ThiChi
-
6The U.S.A., Irak, and The Fall of Rome...
by Explorer inthe u.s.a. should have taken saddam husseim out of business when it was right to do it.
they had to play their stupid international chess game thinking saddam was usefull to keep a political balance in the region.. it has happened over and over again in u.s.a. history.
the stupid cowboys running the white house always end up fighting the criminals they were in bed with before, or they tolerated for political reasons.. take for instance nicaragua.
-
-
-
24
Dream of Going Back
by professor ini awoke from sleep about a half hour ago from a dream in which i returned to the witnesses.
i had become so upset from losing my family and friends that i decided to return and seek reinstatement even though secretly in my heart i did not believe (i was trying to fool the elders).. i awoke from the dream with illusions of actually following through with this idea.
it took me about 5 minutes to arrive at reality.
-
-
ThiChi
Professor:
Do you have many loved ones/ friends back in the WT? I too think of my friends often, and some still keep in contact with me.................
-
15
ONE MORE ISSUE ON IRAQ
by Yerusalyim in.
hey saddam and all you peace nics!!!!!!!!!!!!.
na na da boo boo!!!!!!!!
-
-
ThiChi
""Saddam Hussein has done more in the way of environmental pollution than all the world combined with the oil well fires after '91's war, and yet the Earth Summit doesnt hold him accountable. The same goes for human rights. Saddam Hussein is getting a total pass, and who's being blamed for trying to do something about it? We are, the United States.""
-
15
ONE MORE ISSUE ON IRAQ
by Yerusalyim in.
hey saddam and all you peace nics!!!!!!!!!!!!.
na na da boo boo!!!!!!!!
-
-
ThiChi
"Liberals are generally all for nation building. They wanted to nation build in Haiti, for example. They couldn't wait to nation build in Kosovo, and they can't wait to nation build in the Middle East, with a Palestinian state. But in Iraq, we're talking about a regime change that would end up with a pro-American, Western-style government - maybe even a democracy - and liberals don't want any part of that. "
-
87
Its Time to get IRAQ
by Amazing inhad the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
-
-
ThiChi
Yerusalyim:
I agree 100% People forget it was a majority of Saudi Nationals that participated in 911. They have held fund raisers and funneled much money to these bastards .
Edited by - thichi on 6 September 2002 12:9:33
-
87
Its Time to get IRAQ
by Amazing inhad the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
-
-
ThiChi
""Liberals think they are too sophisticated to reduce themselves to combat or any violence, and our enemies are way too much the victim to be held accountable for their violence. I'm not trying to illustrate absurdity by being absurd. This is just a sad reality.""
""Saddam Hussein has done more in the way of environmental pollution than all the world combined with the oil well fires after '91's war, and yet the Earth Summit doesnt hold him accountable. The same goes for human rights. Saddam Hussein is getting a total pass, and who's being blamed for trying to do something about it? We are, the United States.""
-
87
Its Time to get IRAQ
by Amazing inhad the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
-
-
ThiChi
"""I think Bush is playing the "terrorist victim" card and taking too many liberties using the 9/11 tragedy to take care of America's unfinished business. Nothing worse than using a tragedy to advance an agenda you already had before it happened."""
Bold statements with no proof. Before 911, Bush was accused of isolationism and not taking more interest in the world. Now, liberals like yourself have reversed, stating that Bush now has a world intervention plan. If this was not such a serious matter, I would be laughing my A** off right now.....
Dont worry, As history has shown over and over, it is the brave and undaunted that have raised to the occasion to defeat such evil in the world while others can only reap the benefits of these brave actions.
Edited by - thichi on 6 September 2002 11:22:41
Edited by - thichi on 6 September 2002 11:32:17
-
87
Its Time to get IRAQ
by Amazing inhad the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
-
-
ThiChi
What's up with this? They demand proof and yet they don't...?
France against publishing secret documents on Iraq's weapons programs
ADVERTISEMENT France said it was against publishing top-secret evidence on Iraq's alleged development of weapons of mass destruction, saying the public arena was not the place to wage such a campaign.
"These are not issues which we can deal with publicly. This calls for serenity and seriousness, and we should therefore beware of any leaks and any saber-rattling proposals," Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told France Info radio.
On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said he would in the coming weeks release damning information about Baghdad's alleged efforts to develop nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, to prove the threat posed by Saddam Hussein.
The foreign minister said that France and Britain had shared information on the proof of such a weapons program. and it "is out of the question to divulge these exchanges."
De Villepin said it was important to act responsibly in evaluating whether a "country could own chemical or biological weapons, and if it could turn into a threat."
He added it was important that France evaluate such risks together with its European partners.
"The international community is today very worried, which justifies our determination in the face of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."
Washington on Wednesday stepped up its war rhetoric, with President George W. Bush calling Saddam Hussein a "serious threat" and saying he would take his case against Iraq to the United Nations next week.
De Villepin said "France, the world, cannot accommodate such a risk, and that is why we demand with insistance the return of the UN (weapons) inspectors to Iraq and that the country conforms with the demands of the international community."
If it did, he stressed, it was up to the UN Security Council to decide on any international action.
UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in 1998 in the face of an imminent US and British missile attack on Baghdad, and have since been barred from returning despite insistent UN demands.
-
87
Its Time to get IRAQ
by Amazing inhad the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
-
-
ThiChi
I agree!
If we dont address this cancer now, it will spread, like Hitler did.
"Tony Blair has apparently learned the lesson of September 11th, that tens of thousands of innocent civilians in the U.S., Britain, and other Western countries are endangered if Saddam Hussein teams up with these terrorists."
""The number of really evil tyrants in the world is very few, but what makes them powerful are the Neville Chamberlains of the world, the European Unions of the world, and the Bush 41ers of the world who look at evil and don't see evil. This is what empowers evil.""
-
26
Wanna E-mail George W Bush?
by cellomould instop the rush to war
most americans agree that iraqs longtime dictator, saddam hussein, is a sadistic thug.
despite this, white house calls for a massive, preemptive invasion of iraq are dangerously misguided, and not in tune with americans current priorities.
-
-
ThiChi
Well, what do you know..........
France against publishing secret documents on Iraq's weapons programs
ADVERTISEMENT France said it was against publishing top-secret evidence on Iraq's alleged development of weapons of mass destruction, saying the public arena was not the place to wage such a campaign.
"These are not issues which we can deal with publicly. This calls for serenity and seriousness, and we should therefore beware of any leaks and any saber-rattling proposals," Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told France Info radio.
On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said he would in the coming weeks release damning information about Baghdad's alleged efforts to develop nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, to prove the threat posed by Saddam Hussein.
The foreign minister said that France and Britain had shared information on the proof of such a weapons program. and it "is out of the question to divulge these exchanges."
De Villepin said it was important to act responsibly in evaluating whether a "country could own chemical or biological weapons, and if it could turn into a threat."
He added it was important that France evaluate such risks together with its European partners.
"The international community is today very worried, which justifies our determination in the face of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."
Washington on Wednesday stepped up its war rhetoric, with President George W. Bush calling Saddam Hussein a "serious threat" and saying he would take his case against Iraq to the United Nations next week.
De Villepin said "France, the world, cannot accommodate such a risk, and that is why we demand with insistance the return of the UN (weapons) inspectors to Iraq and that the country conforms with the demands of the international community."
If it did, he stressed, it was up to the UN Security Council to decide on any international action.
UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in 1998 in the face of an imminent US and British missile attack on Baghdad, and have since been barred from returning despite insistent UN demands.