This might be a question for Leolaia, but I noticed in researching the gospel of Mark this week that the dates the WTBTS gives for the writing of the other synoptic gospels does not seem to agree with most New Testament scholars.
The All Scripture book gives the following dates:
- Matthew: Writing Completed: c. 41 C.E.
- Mark: Writing Completed: c. 60–65 C.E.
- Luke: Writing Completed: c. 56–58 C.E.
This would put Mark as the last of the three synoptic gospels to be written, and therefore the WTBTS does not adhere to the Markan priority hypothesis.
Wikipedia states that: "t he theory of Markan priority is today accepted by the majority of New Testament scholars".
- Is there a good reason why the WTBTS dates the synoptic gospels in that order?
- How can they date Matthew and Luke so early?
- Is it merely because the WTBTS rejects the possibility of a "Q" source, and possibly even the idea of collusion between the writers altogether?
- Or is it because many scholars put the writings of Luke and Matthew after the destruction of Jerusalem, meaning the "prophecies" of destruction became historical accounts of past events by the time they were written?