Instead, some researchers have a hypothesis that explains the biological basis of homosexuality via epigenetic mechanisms (epi-marks), where the fetus is sensitive to hormonal influences in the womb.
This is one of the areas where the JWs say one thing in their literature, and say another thing amongst themselves in private.
In the literature, you will read things like "we don't know whether homosexuality is something from birth or if there are other factors", whereas JWs will say among themselves that it's definitely a learned behaviour, a lifestyle choice - a product of imperfection that will be wiped out in the "new system".
What most fundamental religionists don't seem to recognise is that it's not so much about sex as it is about love, hopes and dreams and who you are.
That's very well put, and gets to the point of what is really wrong with AMIII's rant as MMM explained. If he stuck to those few scriptures, he might at least have the appearance of having a leg to stand on (which he probably doesn't) but what he does instead is to go way beyond that, making up a totally random rule that it's wrong to buy tight pants because they might be made by homosexuals, and by extension and inferrence of those listening, having any interaction with homosexuals is scripturally wrong.
So when AMIII is going on his rant, he's not just ranting against the act of homosexual sex, which many religious fundementalists also take issue with, but he's going way beyond that, advocating ostracism and ultimately veiled hatred not just towards an act but hatred towards a people and against their hopes and dreams.
That's why:
To me, it's the worst kind of homophobia.
