Yeah, the "Walsh Case", S&R. I got the full transcription in pdf. somewhere in my hard drive. Hard to read through and through to find the relevant bits.
Eden
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Yeah, the "Walsh Case", S&R. I got the full transcription in pdf. somewhere in my hard drive. Hard to read through and through to find the relevant bits.
Eden
love this young fellows discourse on the watchtowers completely messed up and twisted view of the 'faithful and discreet slave'.. he shreds their entire false teaching and doctrine in a few minutes.... .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_9ukq86dee&list=pl0d60f08a64dea48e.
marked
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Hey.
I need your help if possible. I would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the WTS that could help me build a case.
Case in point is: Can an individual JW hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "Organization" and still continue to be a JW if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?
I remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the Bible....or another one (Publishers book?) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.
I got an excellent quote from Rutherford in the booklet "Intolerance" but that was from 1936 already. Is there anything I could use that's more recent?
Thank you in advance for any help.
Eden
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
*shameless thread bump for those who missed it due to the hollidays*
Eden
is the united nations letter about watchtower's involvement from 1991 to 2001 still available on the united nations webpage?.
marked
"then there will be a great tribulation, not seen since the beginning of time nor will everoccure again.
im saying,christ was talking about the comingdestruction of jerusalem in the 1st century and not the end of the world but the end of the jewish system of things.
there is no end of the world.
marked
Ex-Elder, currently MS, but I suspect that not for long. Some wheels are turning as we speak.
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
Hello everyone.
Just wanted to let you know that I've published a new article on the website of the Christian Fraternity of God's People, www.cfjp.weebly.com
The article is called: "Rejoice In The Hope! - The Unifying Hope For All Christians"
It's divided into several sections:
1. "In the beginning..."
2. Created "in God's image"
3. Sin and death "enter the world"
4. God held fast to his purpose towards mankind
5. Jesus came to reveal God's purpose
6. the "sons of God" have a celestial hope
7. The death caused by Adam is the absence from God
8. "Flesh and blood cannot inherit God's Kingdom"
9. Christian "one hope" versus "another sort of good news"
10. Declared righteous by faith for a heavenly reward
11. Baptism and the salvation of the "children of God"
12. The role of works in the salvation of the sons of God
13. The "other sheep", the "144.000" and the "great crowd"
14. God's purpose for Earth and what is "paradise"
15. Our knowledge is still partial
16. "Rejoice in the hope"
I hope you enjoy reading it. I wrote it for someone especially dear to me, as a testament of my own hope, but I thought that others could benefit from it as well. As usual, your comments are welcome.
Eden
Double Post
One can only understand the statement: "For all the wild animals and for all the birds, I have provided grass and leafy plants for food." - In the sense that herbivores and invertebrates are usually found at the bottom of the food chain, thus making vegetation the basis for the vast majority of the observable wildlife.
Eden