I see that, but it doesn't take me to my last post - that's the key request ... in a thread with dozens of pages, where my last post is buried somewhere on the last 10-15 pages, it would be helpful to have a quick way to find it and see what has been posted ever since. At least on my ipad it takes me always to the OP.
EdenOne
JoinedPosts by EdenOne
-
8
Forum feature request
by EdenOne inthis one for simon.
others chime in if you agree.. sometimes i find it hard to track the threads where i have posted and where i have posted last on a particular thread.
it's very time consuming to go and look for it.
-
46
How many years did you waste away in the Org?
by Tallon inin my case; 27 years.
7 of which were as a ministerial serpent ... sorry, i mean 'servant' ;).
-
EdenOne
40, from 4 to 44. Baptized at 16. MS and Elder then resigned, then MS again, then removed, then disassociated.
-
8
Forum feature request
by EdenOne inthis one for simon.
others chime in if you agree.. sometimes i find it hard to track the threads where i have posted and where i have posted last on a particular thread.
it's very time consuming to go and look for it.
-
EdenOne
I know those routes, but the key element here is to direct the logged in user to its last post on the thread; regardless of being one that was started by the user or just posted on.
-
347
ARC - Case Study 54 - All Exhibits have been released
by jwleaks inall exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
-
EdenOne
OC, where did you take that quote from?
Edit: Nevermind, I have found it
Also...two "dislikes" to the OP? Wow!
-
8
Forum feature request
by EdenOne inthis one for simon.
others chime in if you agree.. sometimes i find it hard to track the threads where i have posted and where i have posted last on a particular thread.
it's very time consuming to go and look for it.
-
EdenOne
This one for Simon. Others chime in if you agree.
Sometimes I find it hard to track the threads where I have posted and where I have posted last on a particular thread. It's very time consuming to go and look for it. So, I would like to suggest, if possible, the following feature:
On the top bar, next to "New Thread", there could be another title: "My posts". When clicked by the logged in user, this would open a list, sorted in chronological order (starting with the most recent), of all the threads where the user has posted on, regardless of who has started the thread. When one of the threads is selected and clicked on, the user is then taken to the point on the thread where its last post was made. This would save a lot of time when looking to pick up a thread where we left off.
Is this complicated to implement?
-
16
EU court upholds an employer's right to ban religious symbols
by careful infirst i should say that i do not like islam for multiple reasons, not the least of which is the moslem treatment of women.
still, the free exercise of anyone's peaceful observance of their religion, including moslems, trumps my personal preferences.
also, living in america, i evidently enjoy a greater degree of religious liberty than i see in recent years in continental europe, something that continues to baffle me.. today the european court of justice, the same group that has stood up for the rights of jws, has decreed that it is ok for employers to ban the wearing of religious symbols among employees.
-
EdenOne
This could open a can of worms tho.
What if the employer bans religious symbols such as the hijab, but allows someone to wear a jewelry with a cross?
What if the employer is adept of a certain religion and wishes to have its religious symbol at the workplace. Can an employee of a different religion feel offended and demand that the symbol is withdrawn?
-
16
EU court upholds an employer's right to ban religious symbols
by careful infirst i should say that i do not like islam for multiple reasons, not the least of which is the moslem treatment of women.
still, the free exercise of anyone's peaceful observance of their religion, including moslems, trumps my personal preferences.
also, living in america, i evidently enjoy a greater degree of religious liberty than i see in recent years in continental europe, something that continues to baffle me.. today the european court of justice, the same group that has stood up for the rights of jws, has decreed that it is ok for employers to ban the wearing of religious symbols among employees.
-
EdenOne
Why bring religious symbols to the workplace, anyway?
-
496
This is What I Would Need in Order to Believe
by cofty insometimes theists challenge atheists about what evidence would be required before they would believe.
various unlikely scenarios are offered in reply.
i have taken the bait myself in the past.. i think the correct answer is much more ordinary.
-
EdenOne
I do in fact wish that I could have a belief in a personal deity that cares about me and will allow me to continue my conscious existence after I die.
My feelings exactly. I also think that, if such a loving god exists, then he should be able to forgive my lack of belief, because, I have done nothing to warrant eternal punishment. And if such deity should deem me worthy of eternal punishment just because I couldn't believe, well ... then such a petty god wouldn't deserve my worship anyway.
-
496
This is What I Would Need in Order to Believe
by cofty insometimes theists challenge atheists about what evidence would be required before they would believe.
various unlikely scenarios are offered in reply.
i have taken the bait myself in the past.. i think the correct answer is much more ordinary.
-
EdenOne
The moral evil is done by free conscious agents. The only problem is natural evil.
No. Read what I wrote. The persistence of evil. There's no compelling enough reason that an Almighty and all-loving god would tolerate the persistence of evil, natural or caused by free-willed agents. And why does god need that humans (again, mediators) explain to other humans why god tolerates evil? Why can't he clearly tell that to everyone, directly?
what kind of mediation do you mean?
Why is god unable / unavailable to communicate with humans universally? Is he bound by time so that he only has 24 hours a day? is he bound by space so that he can only be on some place at the same time? Why does god require a religious framework, prophets, priests, seerers, mediums in order to relay his messages and accept worship from his creations? The most efficient method of communication would be two-way direct communication with each individual, anywhere, anytime. Why is god unable to do so, and instead seems to rely on means that are prone to introduce error and distortion into the communication?
This is a very strict concept of God.
Well, it's what Jesus and Paul, pillars of the Christian faith, have said about the necessity of faith. "Without faith is impossible to please God" (Heb 11:6) The god of the bible doesn't necessarily demands my reason, but clearly demands my faith, or my belief in unsubstantiated claims. Actually, it demands that I chose faith over reason, should both be in conflict.
-
496
This is What I Would Need in Order to Believe
by cofty insometimes theists challenge atheists about what evidence would be required before they would believe.
various unlikely scenarios are offered in reply.
i have taken the bait myself in the past.. i think the correct answer is much more ordinary.
-
EdenOne
It begs to be answered why would the god of christianity - heck, ANY god - would require mediation in its dealings with the human beings that the divinity supposedly caused to exist.
It begs to be answered why would a deity create lifeforms and gift them with extraordinary intelligence, and then demand that they relate to him by faith.
It begs to be answered why a god that portrays itself as all-powerful and the apex of love would allow the existence and persistence of evil in any form.
It begs to be answered why such an Almighty and loving god would value his reputation more than the endless suffering of the creatures he supposedly caused to exist.
Turns out that life makes a lot more sense (albeit is much less heart-warming) when god is removed from the equation.