neat blue dog3 hours agoSo many of "The Experts" have made fools of themselves trying to disprove the historicity of Biblical details, and going for this minutiae is really reaching. Not original, and not impressed.
Good thing I'm not an expert trying to impress you, then. A true expert doesn't set himself to prove the Bible wrong, you see. He follows the evidence available and based on that, formulates explanations. Sometimes (many times) the FACTS are overwhelmingly not favorable to the accuracy of the biblical narratives; sometimes they are.
The thing where I am a true expert is in knowing my own path out of belief; in that path, I had to make sure every step of the way that I was making the right decision by rejecting the Bible as the "Word of God" to which I must heed. And in 100 out of 100 times, in every detail, the verdict points to the Bible being a fascinating collection of documents that tell a story of how an insignificant tribal worship of a weather god in northern Arabia became the largest religious phenomenon in the history of mankind - but that's all there is to it. It's as fascinating as it is deceptive in its claims.
The burden of proof is not with "The Experts", is with those who make extraordinary claims that demand extraordinary proof - at least something more than fallacy of circular reasonings.