On my part, I'm grateful that Mr. Loesch and WT lawyers make this kind of statements: it was exactly how my wife opened her eyes to the shameless hypocrytes these men are. As a result, she left. Keep it coming, 'bro' Loesch!
Eden
in gerrit losch's public statement to the superior copurt of california.
http://www.watchtower.exposed/?p=364.
documents: https://www.dropbox.com/s/49zyexvagn7ux7j/losch%20public%20statement.jpg?dl=0.
On my part, I'm grateful that Mr. Loesch and WT lawyers make this kind of statements: it was exactly how my wife opened her eyes to the shameless hypocrytes these men are. As a result, she left. Keep it coming, 'bro' Loesch!
Eden
in gerrit losch's public statement to the superior copurt of california.
http://www.watchtower.exposed/?p=364.
documents: https://www.dropbox.com/s/49zyexvagn7ux7j/losch%20public%20statement.jpg?dl=0.
So, if Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses = Governing Body, sue them as well.
Eden
in gerrit losch's public statement to the superior copurt of california.
http://www.watchtower.exposed/?p=364.
documents: https://www.dropbox.com/s/49zyexvagn7ux7j/losch%20public%20statement.jpg?dl=0.
Actually because Loesch was a member of the GB before 2000, and therefore, liable as a former member of the Board of Directors of the Watchtower Society, I wouldn't be surprised if he comes to 'resign' from his GB position in order to avoid being called to stand before a court.
Eden
in gerrit losch's public statement to the superior copurt of california.
http://www.watchtower.exposed/?p=364.
documents: https://www.dropbox.com/s/49zyexvagn7ux7j/losch%20public%20statement.jpg?dl=0.
Seems to me that future lawsuits must be directed both at the Watchtower [Corporation] AND at the Governing Body as well, since they clearly attempt to legally disentangle themselves, whilst 'spiritual oversight entity' over the Jehovah's Witnesses, from the Administrative, corporate entity. Therefore, who decides the doctrinally-driven policies isn't the Watchtower per se, but solely the Governing Body.
At least until some jurisprudence establishes a chain of command between the Governing Body and the Watchtower. We all know it exists, but prove it in a court of law is a whole other ball game. Remember, both entities were legally separated in 2000 under Henschel.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
Ruby:
i'd like to question and broaden what "revelation from the a supernatural source" means anyway.
Perhaps it's best if I give you a familiar example. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are said to be "Abrahamic" faiths. How did Abraham get his faith in the first place? By means of a revelation from the divinity:
Genesis 12:1-4 The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you. I will make you into a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” So Abram went, as the Lord had told him (...)
I'm not setting a discussion here if Abraham really heard a REAL voice from God, or if he was schizophrenic and IMAGINED to hear a voice from the supernatural realm, or if Abraham invented the whole story, or if this entire story is an "ad-hoc" mythologization from a later period of time. What I mean is: At the beginning of Abraham's faith [according to Genesis, that is; if you read 1 Enoch the story goes considerably different] there's a "revelation" from a supernatural source.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
BOTR, my "problem" with revelation is that it can rationally be disputed as a) product of mental illness; b) product of an induced altered state of mind (hypnosis, drugs, starvation, dehydration, sun stroke, delirium...); c) ad-hoc mythologization; d) deliberate deceit.
My hypothesis is that, at the basis of [most] every religion before humanist age, there is always a "revelation", or a "supernatural enlightenment", or a "mystical connection with the supernatural domain". I would like to know if any religion has developed out of mere observation or thought process that doesn't include the supernatural.
And, Vivian, good observation about Jainism.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
Coded Logic:
Wait, are you looking for a religion whos founder didn't claim revelation?
Yes, exactly. Whatever mythology came to be constructed afterwords by its adherents, it's not relevant as long as it hasn't become a fundamental part of that religion.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
Ruby, thank you for your input. I'll tell you where the crux of my interest is: For the sake of argument, let's assume that every "revelation", "mystical connection" and "supernatural enlightenment" can be rationally explained away by altered states of mind caused by mental illness (schizoprenia, bipolar disorder...) induced hypnosis, 'near-death experiences', extreme starvation, or by hallucinogenic substances.
If every "revelation" / "mystical connection" / "supernatural enlightnenment" may be the result of the factors above, is there ANY religious system pre-humanist that isn't dependant on the factors I have mentioned? That's what I'm aiming to investigate.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
Coded Logic,
As far as I could (superficially) read, Jainism might be regarded as a religion without a "revelation" at its inception - although their devotion to jinas and their elevated view of the tirthankaras sometimes may strike as some sort of 'mystical connection with supernatural [in this case, previously human] beings". But I agree, it may well be regarded as an exception to the norm.
Eden
i'm researching on the common trait of mostly every religion coming from pre-humanist times, and that would be, the notion of "revelation", that is, that at the beginning of every [i say this with caution because i'm admitting to exceptions] religion there is some sort of "revelation" from supernatural being(s) of some sort.. my question is: do you know of any example of religions from the past that you can confidently say that were exempt from "revelation"?
this is not the same as asking if there were religions without gods, or religions of nature.
i'm not even considering what i understand as philosophical-ethical systems, such as confucionism or platonism my purpose is to find out if, at the starting point of all religions of the past, there is a "revelation", or merely "observation / contemplation".
Coded Logic,
regarding Zoroastrianism, Wiki states:
"According to Zoroastrian belief, when Zoroaster was 30 years old, he went into the Daiti river to draw water for a Haoma ceremony; when he emerged, he received a vision of Vohu Manah. After this, Vohu Manah took him to the other six Amesha Spentas, where he received the completion of his vision. This vision radically transformed his view of the world, and he tried to teach this view to others."
I think this puts a "revelation" or "supernatural enlightenment" at the origin of Zoroastrianism.
Eden