ianao-ROFLMAO!!!!
that was simply beautiful. i wish i could have been there to see it. i hope you are duely ashamed of yourself.-nate
witnesses: "why, no sir.
witnesses: "well, actually sir if...".
witnesses: "ok sir, but may i just say something?".
ianao-ROFLMAO!!!!
that was simply beautiful. i wish i could have been there to see it. i hope you are duely ashamed of yourself.-nate
i recieved this email this morning and found it amusing so i thought i would share it here.
the following is an actual exam question given on a university of.
washington chemistry mid term.
dark clouds-LMFAO, that was way too funny. thanks for your scientific sharings.-nate
i'm here as long as simon will have me, like it or not.
fred, lets bible study buddy.. yerusalyim.
there are more things in heaven and earth, horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.. shakespere: hamlet
yeru-that's a healthy attitude. i've enjoyed reading your posts, so i'm glad you are here to stay.-nate
i've been sitting here a little while lurking about and reading posts...and.
forcing myself not to post to several threads that i know would get me.
i have a comment that i have to make though, and i hope that.
waiting, LOL!
i think the "dippy guy" you are refering to is the "deep thoughts, by jack handey" guy on saturday night live.
independent thinking .
a skill we all need .
what is independent thinking?.
jang-nice post, very well thought out. it's amazing what a little "independant thinking" can do, isn't it?:)
machislopp-nice to see you around again!-nate
when i married my jw wife i was told that marriage was a very important thing.. i have, however, later learned that:.
1) my sister-in-laws husbands jw brother got divorced because his jw wife fooled around.. 2 - 3) 2 couples were divorced after we got married (212 years ago).
one of them had only been married for a couple of years.
right on, thirdson, glad things worked out for you in the long run.
as far as your assesment of the roles in a partnership, i couldn't agree more. those who treat their wives as second class citizens are missing out on the true beauty of women.-nate
i've been sitting here a little while lurking about and reading posts...and.
forcing myself not to post to several threads that i know would get me.
i have a comment that i have to make though, and i hope that.
LOL, emyrose, duely noted. enjoyed your quotes.:)-nate
i've been sitting here a little while lurking about and reading posts...and.
forcing myself not to post to several threads that i know would get me.
i have a comment that i have to make though, and i hope that.
i really don't see how you could describe LW's post on this thread as "nasty, self-rightous" or "condemnatory", but each one to his or her own.
" I'm sorry you can't see that for exactly what it is. "
um, me too, i guess.
my post was addressed to you personally(or at least part of it), if you take it personally, that's cool with me, but i have tried to be respectful and civil with my differences of opinion. sometimes, though, people are still upset about something that has happened in the past and so they become a tad sensitive to things said later on that do not single them out. that is understandable, but using it to platform is not very cool in my book. if one goes out looking for trouble, one will probably find it, if one tries to avoid it, there is usually no problem. i will try to follow this advice as well.-nate
i've been sitting here a little while lurking about and reading posts...and.
forcing myself not to post to several threads that i know would get me.
i have a comment that i have to make though, and i hope that.
tina, first off, i never said you didn't have the RIGHT to comment, i just asked why. second, i'm quite familiar with all the interchange between you and LW on the DB, so i'm not being "unfair", IMO. i would never had posted what i did to you had i not been aware of LW's comments as well. i think it's clear from LW's post on this thread that he was not instigating anything with you. he directed his comments toward the author of the thread, esmeralda, and he didn't single out anyone in particular.
i'm just so tired of even the most peaceful thread having to turn into a podium for personal arguments. i am not biased in this because, if you will recall, on a past thread, i expressed my opinion to LW that maybe he should drop it. i think he has. i don't think he did it because of what i said, i only use this as an example to show that i have not been "fighting" for LW, i doubt he would want me to. i present this only as a concerned and independant poster.-nate
i've been sitting here a little while lurking about and reading posts...and.
forcing myself not to post to several threads that i know would get me.
i have a comment that i have to make though, and i hope that.
hey still a loser, don't you have some animal porn to get back to? you know that you don't speak for anyone but yourself, bugger off!