I have been doing some research on C14 dating. I thought the "simplest" way to check it out would be to read a thesis on why it is "wrong" and then research these arguements and see if they are wanting.The thesis is at http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html
So here goes. I will post the different points and hopefully we can get a few good threads going.
1. The thesis makes the point that because the flood occured, the carbon in different materials would be as it is now. It says:
"Creationist researchers have suggested that dates of 35,000 - 45,000 years should be re-calibrated to the biblical date of the flood.[6] Such a re-calibration makes sense of anomalous data from carbon dating -- for example, very discordant "dates" for different parts of a frozen musk ox carcass from Alaska and an inordinately slow rate of accumulation of ground sloth dung pellets in the older layers of a cave where the layers were carbon dated."
????????
UO