Hi larc,
I happened to have pulled some old notes from my bookcase regarding Eynseck(blows dust off).....
Your post pre-supposes that he blew psychoanalysis out of the water. Of which it didn't.
He was quite the provacative thinker,not considered at all profound.
Those who have evaluated his theories and works actually found him to be dishonest by hiding ambiguous evidence and unsubstantiated opinions with his work. He couched these opinions in scientific verbiage,that made them sound quite legit in drawing unequivical conclusions.
It's been found that he exagerated and misled in his evidence regarding crime and personality.
Not all statisticians agree and approve of how he used factor analysis in his research.
.Phenomonology and other qualitative methods are used and approved by psychologists(of which he didn't,not all phenomena can be reduced to simple numbers,not in the realm of the psyche.He was NOt a psychoanalyst,more in the behavioral realm of psychology).
Some of his theories??
here ya go;
"Smoking does not cause lung cancer.
All things have a physiological explanation
There is a correlation between race and IQ-that blacks have a genetically transmitted handicap....
and last but not least,his insidious effort to detach the conscious mind from human action....."
I can go on,but i do think the little I shared brings some his theories into question.
I know in the course of study I took,he only gets a minor mention on the introvert extrovert theory,nothing more.
I did go thru several rather new texts here in my possession and it doesn't seem that he was any great threat to the more profound thinkers and honest researchers.
I also have some notes on what he wrote about jews and intelligence,Unfortunately,like my postings,my notes on that part are unreadable lol. Quite into eugenics wasn't he?
Thanks for the compliment on 10 nutty beliefs.I need to go thru the pile of notebooks one day here. maybe I can add something as good and relevant again :> I have mounds of writings and essays that i havent looked at in yonks ages lol.T
Just from some old notes I had here.Tina
Todays Affirmation:
The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working.