When discussing the VAT 4956 tablet the article says (pg 25):
"Because of the superior reliability of the lunar positions, researchers have carefully analyzed these 13 sets of lunar position on VAT 4956."
The article goes on to say that the researchers' analysis reveals that "all 13 sets match calulated positions for 20 years earlier, for the year 588/587 B.C.E."
On page 27 it is stated that "the lunar position in line 3 (of VAT 4956) finds an exact match on Nisanu 9 of 588 B.C.E. "Reference is then made to footnote 21 which mentions that "the previously mentioned analysis concluded that on Nisan u9, the moon was 2 deg, 04 minutes in front of and 0 degree below the star beta Virginis. It was considered and exact match."
The article's conclusion concerning VAT 4956 depends entirely on the results of these reseachers!
However, the researchers are NOT identified! We do not know who they are!
The reader is supposed to simply accept the conclusions made by unknown persons!