Question for Cofty, Snare or anyone else who can weigh in. This question is because I want to know the correct info, not because I am being argumentative.
Does what I posted fit with the current understanding? I noticed that what I thought about surviving due to natural reasons and the gene pool eventually skewing that way seems to disagree with what Cofty posted below, or is it both? Do I understand it wrong? Is it mutations more than just survival due to natural variations that become the norm over time? Or are what I am calling natural variations actually mutations, so we are saying the same thing in different words?
____________________________
Cofty said:
The part that DOES make sense are how bodies adapt over time to surroundings and use.
They don't.
Evolution results from the non-random selection of random mutations. It's about changes of the frequency of allelles in a genes pool.