I am just speculating here..........but there's oddities in Vicki's judgement, in my observor-only opinion. Or perhaps I just watch too much Law & Order.
Assuming the above case & Vicki are both Canadian Law.
Vicki's case was judge only - did she have a choice? Did she have a choice of a jury?
Vicki's judge was a woman....would seem a good move, but sometimes women seem to be over zealous to prove they're not swayed by female things. And that's just my opinion.
Vicki's judge seemed to understand what the WT did to Vicki - by her scathing remarks about the WTBTS actions towards Vicki.
But then............a win of $5,000. Akin to a win of $1.00 of times past when a judge/jury didn't really agree with the person suing, but really didn't see a way around granting a winning - so the money won was almost an insult. Or perhaps she really did see Vicki's side - but had pressure to side against Vicki, so the judge played both sides of the table.
The judge is no dummy - she most likely guessed that the WTBTS had tried to settle beforehand (it's common - in usa, estimates that 90% of all cases are settled before coming to trial). She had to know that the WTBTS's cost were higher than $5,000. By granting such a small win, she was telling the WTBTS that if they filed for their court costs to be paid by Vicki - there was chance the judge would go along with the WTBTS.
The WTBTS is no dummy - they saw the $5,000 win - and knew immediately they could win the war, even though they lost the battle, if the judge helped them.
The judge helped. The judge (per Hawk's quote of Canadian Law) could side with the WTBTS or Vicki on paying court costs. The judge chose the WTBTS.
The WTBTS (per HS) has done much for the Canadian Court in certain areas of law. Perhaps the judge wasn't willing to go against the WTBTS for the whole war? Old Boys Club? Political Agenda?
The WTBTS lost, and it could cost them in the future with other victims.
The WTBTS slammed the winning victim hard - to show any other victim or attorney who they were thinking about fighting.
lol - Prime TV Movie in the making, eh?
And no, I don't understand how the above woman received $800,000 from a University by a jury - as a victim.
Something is really odd about all this.