Blondie - As well intentioned as it may be, to "hang them with their own words";
this does not seem to be the effect a quote from
the WT seems to produce, in this audience.
You can see by the responses that the members
here, take the WT to be a sort of "holy source"
and the only 'challegers' tend to be atheists who discredit
themselves by the fact they are atheists
The WT for the JW is reference they do not want to "go beyond".
What you are really doing is acting as an apologist
Because you always use the same source and it is
the source that is flawed.
You are the go-to person to use the Watchtower and try
to 'clarify their doctrines' using their own literature as an authority.
This is CIRCULAR REASONING that always ends up at the same source.
The WT is an expert in circular reasoning.
They start from a false premise and prove their position
using the false premise. You claim to be a "purist" because
as you say "I am not here to teach my personal opinion" ????
But to "help jws and ex jws know what the WTS teaches" ??
But this is not true, you often criticisize what you have qouted.
THAT is using your "personal opinion". Which is great, except you stop
at bringing in any other source except the WT.
And the sense you leave is it is "we" the "insiders" are indeed the
only ones who have "special knowledge" and where do "we"
get this special knowledge ? From the Watchtower, because
that is the sole source you refer to. How about considering other sources,
on the same subjects ? Or just scriptures ?
You are still following the WT "Taboo" ;
which is , do not think for yourself,
do not read any other literature,
do not look into other explanations, do not
"go beyond", what is written in the Watchtower publications.
The reference by the way the WT uses about "do not go beyond",
is from the Bible, and it refers to not going beyond scripture.