As we « studied » the Revelation book for the 2+ time, we read the word-by-word commentary of the Watchtower.... Then we were asked a question on the verse, to give us the impression that, yes, we were actually reasoning. Then we read the Watchtower answer back to the conductor. Then we were rewarded for reciting the Watchtower view with a commendation of something like, very good, excellent comment etc. We all felt great ! Imagine, we had the divine privilege of thoroughly understanding this mysterious book.
Probably reminds you of your 4 years of « Bible » « study » ... yes ?
As we got into nitty-gritty details that all applied to the Watchtower Soc. it seemed more and more absurd that the Almighty God would have compiled a mysterious and symbolic book, only to have it all apply to tracts and assemblies and resolutions.
Taking into consideration the Bible verse comprehension track record of the Watchtower Soc. over the years, makes it seem even more ridiculous for the Watchtower to even attempt a possible explanation of the book of Revelation. But then that’s part of the problem.
the Watchtower’s attitude :
absolutely no humility... brings on other traits like
refusing to admit they have erred ... quite a feat when you claim you are not infallible and are proved wrong over and over again!
The Watchtower refuses to take responsibility for anything, while demanding complete control (example below).
Here is a set of instructions duly noted by all elders attending the 1994 elders course. Bear in mind the elders are instructed to follow the Society’s direction to the letter. You will note the Watchtower will not take any responsibility
Six Expressions That Should Not Be Used on S77 and S79 Forms:
1. Anything alluding to or naming one of the Society's attorneys
2. Any mention of the Legal Department
3. Any comments referring to direction from the Society
4. Any comments mentioning anyone other than the committee itself as a possible influence in the decision reached
5. Any comments that might suggest to someone with a critical eye that the committee did not reach its decision on its own but, instead, somehow yielded to the influence of an outside party
6. Any comments indicating that the elders mishandled the case or committed any error in the investigation or the judicial committee process.
elders course Dec 94
A few last pointers :
Be prepared to turn off your brain and put on the Watchtower head mold. Individual thought and opinion is prohibited.
Ask your questions now. After baptism question are not tolerated.
If you do join, keep your « worldly friends » and stay close to your family. Don’t alienate them with « the Truth » Hope they’ll be there for you if you bail out one day.
good luck! oops... can't say that. I guess it would be JW acceptable to wish you: be fortunate!
wheels