Doug, I appreciate your more tolerant view of homosexuality now that you've left the WT. However, I don't think you really mean what you're saying in your first statement.
As a society, we very much DO, in fact, reject pedophiles (as one example) in their totality. If it comes to your attention that a friend, neighbor, or workmate is indeed a practicing pedophile, are you going to keep on going bowling with him? Watch a ball game with him? Invite him over for dinner, whether you have kids at home or not? I think not, unless he's a very close friend and trying to change.
Not only will such a person be shunned by family and friends--and rightly so--but he is also subject to sanctions by the greater society, such as jail and fines. In Florida, the law now says pedophiles can be kept indefinitely--perhaps for life--in a mental facility AFTER they have served their jail sentence, without further court order. Many states now post pedophiles' pictures on the Web for everyone to see, along with their street addresses. Here in Texas, the Legislature is currently considering a bill to require convicted pedophiles to post a sign in front of their homes--"Warning--Pedophile lives here."
What else can you call this treatment by individuals and society but "rejection of you, the pedophile"?
My point is not to defend pedophiles--simply to point out that rejecting a person's sexuality IS indeed a rejection of that person. The real point at issue is which brands of sexuality are truly deserving of such rejection.
Bill
"If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)