Venice (sigh!):
You don't understand, sweetie. I issued fair warning that if he didn't follow up on his threat that I wasn't ever gonna let him live it down. Now I gotta keep my word. If I don't, then my word's no better than his.
Yadirfy
* http://www.intrex.net/talley/boggess.html .
here is another example of watchtower magick, which makes things go away.. a case almost 10 years old now, where a married jw couple living near charlotte, nc filed charges against elders & the wts.. 8, count'em eight, criminal charges were filed against these defendants.. a jw sister, named ginger boggess was hauled in before a judicial committee because her daughter wanted to join a high school function.. the elders on the committee really musta worked her over, or so she alleged.. the complaint listed:.
1. false imprisonment.
Venice (sigh!):
You don't understand, sweetie. I issued fair warning that if he didn't follow up on his threat that I wasn't ever gonna let him live it down. Now I gotta keep my word. If I don't, then my word's no better than his.
Yadirfy
* http://www.intrex.net/talley/boggess.html .
here is another example of watchtower magick, which makes things go away.. a case almost 10 years old now, where a married jw couple living near charlotte, nc filed charges against elders & the wts.. 8, count'em eight, criminal charges were filed against these defendants.. a jw sister, named ginger boggess was hauled in before a judicial committee because her daughter wanted to join a high school function.. the elders on the committee really musta worked her over, or so she alleged.. the complaint listed:.
1. false imprisonment.
Tallyman, me fine-feddered fwend:
Maybe it turned out for the plaintiffs quite similar to the way it did for a certain individual who posts here on JW.com ... an individual who just recently swore by the hair of his wittol chiney-chin-chin that he was gonna "sue da baaturd" ... but bafoe three to foe dazs were gone by had (foe some 'terious weason ... Ha!) com-pweet-wee changed his wee wittol mind.
Pock, pock, caaaaapooooooooock!
if you read the 97 watchtower cited below you are given the impression that a child molester who is known(that is confessed) would never have privileges in the congregation arrangement.
is that really the case?
in a conversation with the service department it was plainly stated to me personally that a child molester could re-qualify again after a long period of time had passed.
ianao
This too gives me the impression that no pedophile would be allowed special priveladges (sp!) ever in the cong.
Considering who you are (in that you're biased against the WTS to begin with) it's really no surprise that you would express that opinion. In other words, most who have left the Society will see it through the same colored glasses that you wear. So you're not accomplishing much by simply registering your vote out of loyalty to your friends. And that's exactly what it appears that you have done, because you didn't address any specific point ... you just said that you agree with Silentlambs, without explaining why.
Yadirf
if you read the 97 watchtower cited below you are given the impression that a child molester who is known(that is confessed) would never have privileges in the congregation arrangement.
is that really the case?
in a conversation with the service department it was plainly stated to me personally that a child molester could re-qualify again after a long period of time had passed.
Silentlambs,
yadrif,
you may have a great career working for wt pr. perhaps you are already doing so. your propensity to look at a well established fact among jw's and twist it to another meaning clearly smacks of not being entirely honest.
So now you’re going to resort to calling me a liar, are you? Because I see things differently ... different than you do, that makes be a liar does it? Have you considered the possibility that you are doing exactly what you accuse me of, but just can’t really see that you are?
i guess you were one of the folks who believes bill clinton told the truth when he said, "i did not have sex with that woman." to about everyone else in the world when it was found out what he clearly did, he was called a liar. yes, it was a play on words to present a dishonest conclusion. this is much the same in your needless picking of words with the 97 wt article.
I’m disappointed that you have to resort to such baloney in an attempt to defend your thinking.
the truth of the matter shines clearly, that is, the wt was dishonest and did misrepresent its actual intent when it comes to using child molesters for added responsibility.
You keep saying that, but have no convincing argumentation that I can see.
that is the truth, deep down you know it, as does anyone one else that looks at this material.
And so now you are in the business of saying you know what I know and don’t know. Could that also be the reason that you read things into that ’97 WT that weren’t there?
you of course have the right to believe bill clinton and the wt both never told a lie, but i do not think the vast majority of people will agree with your conclusions.
Your thinking what people will or will not agree with does not prove anything.
I wouldn’t be surprised to hear one of these days that you’ve found yourself facing a lawsuit for defamation. Just my opinion. Would that awaken you? Or would you see it as persecution from “momma”? You seem to be taking a lot for granted with what we've been talking about in this thread. Sure, everyone is praising you for being so brave, which possibly helps to egg you on, but it will be you and you alone that may have to answer for your doings with regards to the issue here in this thread. Personally, I hope that you regain your senses and see, where I truly believe, that your thinking is off.
Yadirf
seems to me that we've seen the rise of a new genus of human-like creature over the last century:.
cephalomorticus.
this is evolution in action!.
Goatless Alan
Cephalomorticus infantilus: Yadirf/Friday
I've never had Syphilis!
Yadork
...but can't seem to find it anywhere - for all those insults he hurled.. has your patience run out?.
.
.
Sneeker Beeker:
I have no idea what you are talking about. My response to you was as straightforward as can be. How you can view that as sneaky is beyond my understanding. Perhaps you can explain it in detail, since what you said to me didn't provide me with any clues.
Was plain as day to me and everyone else. Do you need more light to read with?
So as far as your libelous use of Sneeker goes, you are still without cause.
Then sue me!
Yadruff
...but can't seem to find it anywhere - for all those insults he hurled.. has your patience run out?.
.
.
Gobble-butt Capricious:
Ahhh! Out of words already are you Capricious? Had to resort to the old "repetition for emphasis" answer, huh. I think I've cooked your turkey.
Yadork
...but can't seem to find it anywhere - for all those insults he hurled.. has your patience run out?.
.
.
Copernicus
Or isn't it more correctly "capricious"?
And Friday . . . I saw a recent post where someone claimed you were 61 years old and “anointed.” I was ROLFL after seeing that one. Up to now, I’d taken you to be 15 at the most. The angry little child in you comes through so loudly in your rants, that it colors your whole persona with wide brush strokes of juvenile imbecility (this thread being no exception).
That's what you get for being prone to listen to heresy, Capricious.
You listened and put faith in two lies. I'm neither 61 years old or "anointed". I'm older yet, and that's what keeps meself young and handsome ... my looking down my nose at a crowd of blunder-butts such as yourself. Do you ACTUALLY impress yourself as being a person over 12 years old? Boy have you got a distorted view of your little self.
Anyway, I generally try to reply according to what really fits the situation. If I'm replying to an adult that acts like a child, my reply accords the situation. So, by that you can see how I size you up.
Yadork
in every news group, discussion board and chat room there seems to be a few individuals that never seem to completely grasp the art of thinking.
their need to disrupt and irritate reach superstar status in the realm of stupidity.
the desire for attention and recognition though sophomoric post's and chat room spamming becomes as much a part of the entire internet experience as the valuable and useful contributions of others.
Sneeker
Don't youstart. Didn't you learn anything from You Know's chastisement?
Why don't cha sue me! I'm uh-waitin'... Do you think you can pull it off? Why don't you give it a try, huh!
Here's part of a reply I made to you in the other thread:
Quite clearly you are not only pro-apostate, as well as a God- dishonoring apostate yourself, but you are a sneeky one at that. You slithered right on out around my point, Sneeker. Since you have earned the name "Sneeker", you shouldn't whimper anymore when you hear me address you as such. Until you change and stop your sneaking around, I will continue to annoy you with that name -- a name that fits YOUR character.
I may be gettin' close to my 25-per day posting limit due to jackin' 'round with clowns like you, so if I don't show back up today it's not because I'm afraid of getting chastised by a trio of twirps.
Yadirf
...but can't seem to find it anywhere - for all those insults he hurled.. has your patience run out?.
.
.
Sneeeeeker
I can definitely see the justification in /You Know having dubbed you "Sneeker".
In the face of my having said:
Has it actually been forgotten who it was that cast the first stone of offense here?--Yadirf
Your comeback was:
Evidently you do not know the law.
Quite clearly you are not only pro-apostate, as well as a God- dishonoring apostate yourself, but you are a sneeky one at that. You slithered right on out around my point, Sneeker. Since you have earned the name "Sneeker", you shouldn't whimper anymore when you hear me address you as such. Until you change and stop your sneaking around, I will continue to annoy you with that name -- a name that fits YOUR character.
Yadirf