That still doesnt mean you are the spokesperson for religious people though.
Strawman argument, millie. The OP is a religious person who plainly stated his belief. How is it that I am a "spokeman" for religious people when I'm merely discussing the point a religious person presented? Unless you are arguing Bill is the only religious person in the world that has this particular view. In that case, the worst you could accuse me of is being a spokesman for BucketShopBill.
Actually, if you read my comments as you claim, you'd realize that you and I are in total agreement, so 'refuting' me with comments like this one is silly:
For a lack of something to prove anything - you would first have to first establish that the "thing" (miracles, healing, whatever) had validity.
You're so focused on arguing with me you fail to realize you are validating the very points I made earlier in the discussion.