Tell me, do you think terrorism exists in a vaccum and someone just "decides" one day to become a terrorism? Sure, there may be **odd people** like that but on the whole the conflict is about something. I don't think it's possible to resolve the conflicts until people look at the reasons for it. Otherwise, we just get a spiralling escallation of violence.
On the one hand I agree with this point too - terrorism is about something. The question no one bothers to find out is "what?"
On the other hand I don't care what Bin Laden is about. I want him dead. As far as Bin Laden goes for me it is shoot first and ask questions later because of his crimes against civilians.
Obviously in the short term the issue comes down to: do we negotiate with terrorists?
Let's take a well respected man - probably one of the greatest statesmen of the last century: Nelson Mandela. Mandela was by definition a terrorist. I see the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter as follows: terrorists focus on civilian and soft targets whereas freedom fighters resist the military of their oppressors. Often when freedom fighters start losing they might change tactics and resort to terrorism. Nonetheless Mandela was fighting against oppressors in his own country and used terrorism as a mechanism for doing so. Whether or not we agree with his cause (i happen to agree with it) his tactics were questionable - civilian targets.
Now others might point to the example of Mandela and claim terrorism worked. It never. The changes came about because of 2 reasons: Foreign pressure and a reasonable person came into office in the country and was able to change the screwed up policies of the Apartheid past.
The difference for me is that Bin Laden and his cronies terrorism is not to free themselves from the US - they are not living under the US. I have yet to fully understand what the issues are - but I am willing to be educated. Regardless, for me, Bin Laden's actions have earned him a medal made of solid lead.