Julia aka Sheree Stokell,
Thanks for sharing. You obviously put a lot of work into this story. I'm sure it was both painful and healing at the same time.
You had some nice moments of great prose. One of my favorites was this line:
His feelings crushed in
upon themselves and lay in a wreck like a collapsed house of cards.
I also appreciated Alfred's musing about "how Brother Morris was so familiar with what
homosexuals liked."
Nice touch.
The twist about the opal stone was an excellent piece of story-telling. The sad ending is of course all too true for so many ex-JWs.
The overall story arc is good. That being said, and this is just my opinion so take it for what it's worth, I found a lot of your narrative to be too on the nose. I appreciate more subtlety in fiction. You don't have to explain everything. Certainly, any ex-JW or anyone that wishes-they-were-an-exJW will get your points without a lot of frankly unnecessary explanation.
Are you familiar with the axiom of "show me, don't tell me" in reference to writing fiction? The most effective writers generally do much less explaining and let the reader get from the story what they get from the story. Give it some thought. I think a lot of your paragraphs can be trimmed down and the end result would be a lot more powerful.
Also, some of your sentences are kind of convoluted and hard to understand. Consider cutting some of the longer ones down.
For example, this sentence:
Alfred’s heart now had a great big empty place where Barbara once
lived as part of him.
This is a really good sentence that would be stronger without the unnecessary tag at the end:
Alfred’s heart now had a great big empty place where Barbara had
lived as part of him.
After describing their loveless relationship of friendly convenience, you wrote:
Their
religion forbade divorce except for when one spouse cheated, which was
something neither Barbara or Alfred would consider due to their good standing
in the congregation and fear of reprisal.
Any JW or ex-JW knows all of this. You really don't need to explain. It seems heavy-handed and preachy.
I do like how you handle your exchanges of dialogue. I think overall you use dialogue effectively to move the story along, especially during the "apostasy trial." Still, you do (what I think is) a lot of unnecessary explaining. Just tell the story. You shouldn't also explain what everything means as if we don't know. We do know. Frankly, anyone that wouldn't understand the points you are making wouldn't ever read this story any ways. Consider your audience.
Here are a few resources you might find helpful in tightening up what I think could prove to be a very powerful story.
I know how it can be to share your creative works with strangers. It's a vulnerable thing to do. I applaud you for that.
Please take my suggestions in the spirit in which they are intended, to help you become a better writer.
And keep in mind that everything I have written is just my opinion!
Keep writing. I look forward to reading more of your work.
Oubliette
BTW, I love the title!