this video makes valid points and the last pictures in the video says it all imo...i knew witnesses who wore the logo in their jewelry.
the sign represents the organization, so the organization is what is really being worshipped instead of god almighty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktadlxlqee8.
Meh, slippery slope to idolizing the symbol.
Like blood is the symbol of life, but they'll prioritize the symbol over life itself.
_______________________________________________________
I mean, yeah, they definitely idolize the Organization, but it seems like they've actually gone a step further and are idolizing the symbol now.
Sure, they can make fun of Christians for wearing a cross or crucifix necklace, but you can go online and get your JWBorg lapel pin now too.
there're the obvious ones, like the smurfs.
although why still escapes me.
was it because of the magic, that they were "magical creatures", that there were wizards, etc?.
The Smurfs were hated because of Gargamel the Wizard.
He was the bad guy even within the episodes, so I don't know if that reasoning makes sense.
All this despite the fact that, you know, this was a child's cartoon and clearly fiction.
I was actually allowed to watch the Smurfs because my parents truly saw through the superstition of some Witnesses, despite being hardliners in other respects.
And that's what it was, same with Harry Potter: superstition. A bunch of simple-minded superstitious people, afraid of their shadow and ungrounded in science. Figuratively throwing a pinch of salt over their shoulders when spooked by something.
how many can you think of.... they speak for god.. it would seem presumptuous to say they speak for god,.
they are neither inspired nor infallible.. they are god's only channel for issuing truth here on earth.
they won't be apologising for any errors/falsehoods they have promoted in the past that fail.. congregation members must be quick and apologise for their errors to avoid harsh discipline/disfellowshipping.. when they change a major belief/doctrine you must not complain or criticise them.
NotFormer, just wanted to let you know that I wasn't the one to downvote you.
Thanks for the comment.
In general, I feel like people appreciate directed responses over simple up/down votes, and it keeps conversations lively and interactive.
so, first the turning in time got axed, now beards are okay, what is up next?
women wearing dress slacks to the meeting?
birthdays becoming acceptable?
Nice quick watch of less than 10 minutes.
He points out several control tactics in the latest announcement about beards.
Recommend taking a few minutes to watch.
will self is a well known thinker, journalist and writer here in the uk.
i think this article is absolutely on the money.
in any case, well worth a read.
Hilarious. He gets rid of JWs on his doorstep by saying, "I'm a vampire."
That's not one I've ever heard, but it would've shocked me into leaving immediately!
so, first the turning in time got axed, now beards are okay, what is up next?
women wearing dress slacks to the meeting?
birthdays becoming acceptable?
Well, aren't there 9 members now? So all it would take is 4 of them to block a vote. I think probably Losch, Herd and Lett are all old school. If they were the only ones blocking things, then, yes, they can have their 6 votes which is two thirds now that Tony is gone.
Not sure about Jackson. Is he hard, soft or in between?
But then again, hasn't there been some gobbledygook about the Governing Body trying to vote things through unanimously and if not, they put it aside and discuss it more?
I guess maybe those that make the rules can break the rules and remake the rules, so are they really adhering to the two thirds rule at all now?
did they hope that everybody who read the1969 awake as a kid is too senile to remember?.
.
I remember being terrified of thunderstorms as a kid. I was just sure it was Jehovah finally unleashing his wrath and the beginning of Armageddon.
I still don't like them much. My husband loves to sit on the porch and watch them. I don't join him.
how many can you think of.... they speak for god.. it would seem presumptuous to say they speak for god,.
they are neither inspired nor infallible.. they are god's only channel for issuing truth here on earth.
they won't be apologising for any errors/falsehoods they have promoted in the past that fail.. congregation members must be quick and apologise for their errors to avoid harsh discipline/disfellowshipping.. when they change a major belief/doctrine you must not complain or criticise them.
Terrible things are happening in the world.
This means the end is coming because "there will be wars and reports of wars..."
Good things are happening in the world.
This means the end is coming because there will be a cry of "peace and security."
did they hope that everybody who read the1969 awake as a kid is too senile to remember?.
.
Biahi, that just makes me so sad for you and for other little children.
To feel that kind of existential dread at 10 years old.
So cruel.
so, first the turning in time got axed, now beards are okay, what is up next?
women wearing dress slacks to the meeting?
birthdays becoming acceptable?
I predict a sifting process among hardliners and more liberal Witnesses.
There are bodies of elders that love that hard nosed control and will have trouble relaxing into the new standards.
Then there are liberal congregations that will likely just jump in and embrace the change and that might not set well with some regular old publishers that don't like the new loosey goosey rules.
You might see some folks moving congregations to find a better fit.
If that becomes a problem as some congregations empty out and others surge, we might go back to hearing that publishers need to attend the congregation to which they are assigned.
The problem is that that was always determined by preaching territory and with the relaxation in time reporting is that also going to be irrelevant soon?
Looking more and more like there was a coup in the Governing Body, so I would expect to see more little coup's filter their way down to local congregations.
