I also remember that disassociated ones weren't treated the same as the disfellowshipped.
If someone just didn't want to be a JW, then fine. You could still talk to them. Just no spiritual discussion.
Now it's the exact opposite.
Disassociated people are vermin because they are apostates and apostasy is a sin worse than any other.
Whereas before, there was more of a don't ask, don't tell policy. Somebody disassociated themselves, you didn't ask why, and you didn't assume they were apostates.
The water was further muddied when the GB created the notion that someone could disassociate themselves by their actions, like taking a blood transfusion or joining the military.
This was a sneaky move that served to hide their draconian policies. We won't bother to create a judicial committee and disfellowship you, you are just persona non grata. And we can gaslight you and the world by saying you did it to yourself. Audacious!
Plausible deniability to the secular authorities; we don't shun people who believe differently!
In my opinion progress would be going back to disassociating simply meaning no spiritual association. It would actually get the secular authorities off their back because the most egregious thing is that there is no way to leave the religion without harm.
To me all these so-called liberalizing DF changes are actually going backward. More nosy elders in more business more often.
It's a head scratcher.