with a release date of easter 2014, coming soon to a theatre near you: hollywood (tristar pictures) is capitalizing on the near-death-experience theme with a movie starring greg kinnear.
here's a hd trailer:.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih8hmfinsbg.
Lol at the tagline "Discover what is real".
Sounds like a serious version of "Ghost Town" which also starred Greg Kinear - difference was it was a fictional comedy that also starred prominent atheist Ricky Gervais.
This is being passed off as a true story? Personal anecdotes hit the big screen.
What tripe.
Hey Unstop, I'm glad you're beginning to look into evolution at least - try not to limit yourself to a one sided perspective though, you've seen Ray Comforts video now, maybe go to Ken Ham's Creation museum for another creationists perspective, then how about looking at a documentary on Evolution to get a balanced view on the topic?
Also looking at virtually any interviews with Ray Comfort show that he hasn't bothered to even learn the basics of evolution before making multiple videos debunking it. If you want to debunk something - you should first understand it. Ray Comfort doesn't understand (personally I think he's just playing dumb) even the most basic basic basic aspects - yet presumes to 'teach' others about evolution.
Good luck with your research.
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
Perhaps "The Magic of Reality" may be more to your liking Kate - it gets straight to the point and covers alot of interesting topics.
i have almost never had a visual hallucination and i was wondering what they're like.
how "real" do they seem?
is there any kind of a hint you get that tells you they are not real?
Didn't read all thread so don't know if it's been mentioned:
Sensory deprivation hallucinations.
how are we able to do this.. this is not an attempt to stir the pot or cause confusion but i was sitting here thinking of all the really horrid things that the old testament god did to people.
when i was a jw i just purposely put it to the back of my mind always trying to make an excuse.
when i was in field service and someone would ask me about it i would just change the subject.. however i have been reading alot of info lately here about how wonderful jesus is and how he is a direct representation of what god the father would be.
I think I'll retire from these kind of threads from here on out.
In all seriousness Tammy. I hope you know what you're doing and saying and feeling - I hope you are being completely honest with yourself. And I hope you most important are being honest with others.
Kind regards & goodbye.
Zound
i have been online looking for actual images of the hoofed toes of early whales.. there is no lack of articles that say "such and such" had hooves on their toes, like their land dwelling ancestors.. i want images pictures of the relevant fossils.. all these references to hooves alone is like the self referencing of the wt with no actual tangible proof.. i am sick to death of looking at drawings that dont really prove anything....
Also the way whales and dolphins swim (they flex their spines up and down) as opposed to the way fish swim (flex spines side to side) Watch a video of whales swimming and you'll see what I mean.
Indicates they used to be land dwelling creatures.
how are we able to do this.. this is not an attempt to stir the pot or cause confusion but i was sitting here thinking of all the really horrid things that the old testament god did to people.
when i was a jw i just purposely put it to the back of my mind always trying to make an excuse.
when i was in field service and someone would ask me about it i would just change the subject.. however i have been reading alot of info lately here about how wonderful jesus is and how he is a direct representation of what god the father would be.
Hey Tammy, just to repeat:
Thanks for the answer - the truth about Uzzah was given and shared by another person who belongs to Christ and hears Him
So you mean someone else in our modern world was given the truth about this account and they related it to you?
Sorry, just so I understand.
(Also if you could mention who this person is that would be great - but I'd settle for at least the first question)
how are we able to do this.. this is not an attempt to stir the pot or cause confusion but i was sitting here thinking of all the really horrid things that the old testament god did to people.
when i was a jw i just purposely put it to the back of my mind always trying to make an excuse.
when i was in field service and someone would ask me about it i would just change the subject.. however i have been reading alot of info lately here about how wonderful jesus is and how he is a direct representation of what god the father would be.
Thanks for the answer - the truth about Uzzah was given and shared by another person who belongs to Christ and hears Him
So you mean someone else in our modern world was given the truth about this account and they related it to you?
Sorry, just so I understand.
how are we able to do this.. this is not an attempt to stir the pot or cause confusion but i was sitting here thinking of all the really horrid things that the old testament god did to people.
when i was a jw i just purposely put it to the back of my mind always trying to make an excuse.
when i was in field service and someone would ask me about it i would just change the subject.. however i have been reading alot of info lately here about how wonderful jesus is and how he is a direct representation of what god the father would be.
Tammy, what is your answer to the question?
how are we able to do this.. this is not an attempt to stir the pot or cause confusion but i was sitting here thinking of all the really horrid things that the old testament god did to people.
when i was a jw i just purposely put it to the back of my mind always trying to make an excuse.
when i was in field service and someone would ask me about it i would just change the subject.. however i have been reading alot of info lately here about how wonderful jesus is and how he is a direct representation of what god the father would be.
BTW Tammy - I'm awaiting your answer - just to repeat the question in case you missed it:
God did not strike Uzzah dead for touching the ark. Uzzah is one example I was thinking of in my post above.
So just to clarify - did christ/god tell you (in your special voice thingy) that the scribes got that one wrong, make a note in your margin that Uzzah WASN'T struck dead for touching the ark?
A simple yes or no would be sufficient.
