That's for each one to answer. I think
therefore I am. Am I a bag of liquid and solids- yes. But who I am is
tied to those abstract thoughts.
Originally you mentioned how Perry was
constructing his identity around his rigid beliefs (abstract
thoughts), and that you, on the other hand, are somehow too
progressively open and adaptable to be fooled by such.
Then you tell me: ...
"I think therefore I am. Am I a bag of liquid and solids- yes. But who
I am is tied to those abstract thoughts"
So what is the fucking difference between you
two???
You both identify with thoughts, and
seem to have no clue or awareness of anything more or other.
Yet, there is that in you which
must, and does, silently observe all thoughts, beliefs, emotions and occurrences; which
is far closer and more intimate than all of them. Do you see???
You see thoughts and feelings, just
like a leaf in your hand or any other phenomena. Can you see that?
I'm just asking: Can you see that you
see? And if you can see all thoughts, feelings and other phenomena, then what are you? You
are not the leaf or the thoughts or the emotions that you see; so
what are you?
You are not what the mind says or believes. You are nothing that can be observed. Who are you; really?
I'm just asking.
Note: I mean no personal offense. Just feel that the questions are super important and can be life changing.