To be clear: the submission isn't the final report yet.
"The submission will outline key findings based on the hearing’s evidence and the recommendations likely to come from them. The recipients of the submission may then provide their own written submissions in reply.
The Commissioners then consider this information when they form their final recommendations during the course of the Royal Commission." - http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/.../case-studies
As I understand it, the government will review the final policy recommendations and can enact some or all recommendations into law.
What really shocks me is that Watchtower doesn't agree with one single finding. Their response is basically: "not supported by the evidence", "too broad", "incorrect", "should be disregarded", etc. They are so holy; they didn't do anything wrong. It makes me puke.
Take for example their response on the commissions finding "F54 The sanction of disfellowshipping does nothing to protect children in the community". Watchtower's reply begins with: "9.301 No evidence was presented to support the suggested finding." Really? Are they suggesting that they did something to protect children in the community? They go on: "9.304 The suggested finding wrongly assumes a broad obligation upon Jehovah’s Witnesses 'to protect children in the community' but fails to identify how such an obligation exists." #FAIL GO TO THE POLICE!
Morons.