MacHislopp has been tracing the Society?s history of doctrinal revision from 1874 to 1914 as the presence of Jesus.
The 1874 date was promoted, full steam ahead, during the early years. Then in the late 20's the mention of that all important fact was hard to find. In 1929 in the book ?Prophesy? the 1874 date was mentioned. Then the next year, 1930, a cleverly worded hint was published.
* Quote from the year 1930:
? The Golden Age ? page 503
"In Matthew 24 Jesus gives his disciples some proofs that he would be present...These tangible evidences will be the beginning of the work of destroying the present evil conditions and systems. This work of destruction began in 1914... If it is true that Jesus has been present since the year 1914, then it must be admitted that nobody has seen Him with his natural eyes." -
Notice that they do not come right out and say that Jesus? Parousia began in 1914.
Then our resident historian, MacHislopp, found the next mention of the all important date of the Presence of the King in 1943. In the book ? The Truth Shall Make You Free?.
Why the gap of so many years?
Why are they avoiding heavy doctrinal issues now?
Is a major shift in long cherished doctrine on the horizon?
Are they watching the WorldWide Church of God to see if they can survive a major doctrinal switch? Are they wanting to follow the same path?
I sure don?t know, but this inquiring mind does wonder.
Loris