Mizpah,
You ignored my request! I asked you to think about what someone should say if Christianity is in fact false and you didn't even broach the subject! If something is false and you don't have a fully-functional belief system to replace it with (complete with Deity and afterlife) does that mean one should NOT "tear down" the false idea?
You then say:
If you can offer me something better than "love your neighbor as yourself" or "love God with your whole heart, soul and mind" I might be interested. What do you offer to "replace it?"
The problem is that is not ALL Christianity says. I have NO problem with the "golden rule." Many atheists and non-Christians follow this axiom. In fact, Jesus was not the first or only figure to state this. Confucious, Hillel the Elder and many other figures independent of Jesus have espoused this. Case closed.
Now, I DO have a problem with the second statement of "loving God..." Why? Because there is no proof of any deity's existence, period. Also, to state that these two statments (love god and neighbor) are the totality of Christianity is also false. What about the destruction and bloodshed in the OT? What about the "bad advice" of Jesus? Or the contradictions and mythological elements of the Bible? Is that to be believed just because SOME aspects of Christianity are beneficial?
Bradley