While I agree with most of the items on that list, I am going to make a few comments that I feel JWs could justifiably make against your list
Teaching that true Christianity is an organization instead of a way of life
JW's would not see a difference in this....the organization is the way of life
Placing WT literature above the Bible
I must say that even I have a problem accepting this as a complaint against the JWs. Never at any time have I seen the WT or any of it's publications put their words over the Bible. One may disagree with their interpretation of the Bible, or with the rules they place in addition to the Bible, but I cannot think of one single instance where they have said "the Bible says this...but we disagree and want you to do this." Sorry, if we are going to criticise the JWs, lets be a little more specific than this claim (which I would have to call a half-truth).
Falsifying the fact that Charles Russell predicted for 1914 the end of the world, not Christ's return
With all due respect, they have clarified this matter of late...although not very well.
Lying about a so-called "increase" in earthquakes, warfare, famines, persecution, etc., since 1914
"Lying?" Maybe a better phrase would be "wishful thinking" or "selective use of statistics." I think the brothers that write their end-times paranoia actually believe the stuff.
Being quick to disfellowship instead of making efforts to restore persons who have done something wrong
This is a little subjective. So much depends on the local body of elders.
Holding heresy trials and disciplinary hearings in secrecy from the rest of the congregation
And some might rather have their "dirty laundry" aired between just a few people.
Denying that the JW organization is part of Babylon the Great
Such a statement would mean that you know who makes up Babylon the Great. Do you?
Please, don't take this as an attack on your list. Overall, I agree with many of the sentiments expressed. I just like to see arguments that are as fine-tuned as possible.
Bradley