wasa,
And what's more they are unafraid to wear a collar as they grovel before their theocratic instructor.
Know_You
copied from a much-forwarded e-mail, so i appologize for the formatting.
you've probably all heard this before, but indulge me - i'm approaching a birthday!.
older women.
wasa,
And what's more they are unafraid to wear a collar as they grovel before their theocratic instructor.
Know_You
any of you evolutionists ever crunch the numbers?
: Funny thing is, I don't believe I'm speculating..
Nobody ever does.
Know_You
it is clear that the evolutionist is so tied to his religion that he cannot think objectively - so here i issue a challenge of a general nature.
let us develop a focussed discussion in which we agree ahead of time which sub-topic of this noxious subject we address first.. i will take the liberty of suggesting the following:.
given the almost inevitable and immediate degeneration that debates about creation and evolution seem to descend into, how about we address the sociological aspects first - to clear the ground, as it were: how would you feel (whether creationist or apostate evolutionist dog) if incontravertible evidence emerged that the "other" side was actually right?
onacruse (Craig),
Far be it from me to collude in inciting passion during your, no doubt, magnificently mellifluent encounters. However, Mrs Know_You and I - in our special times together - find that reading several chapters of Habbakuk, or Haggai or, on very special occasions, Ezekiel's account of the Valley of the Dry Bones does much to put us in a romantic mood.
Wasa - I do sense that in your case a very rigid regime is required - perhaps you need to be chained down and force fed large segments of the prophet Malachi which you then have to recite from memory......and since nothing worthwhile in life is pain free, any slip of the tongue (as it were) will be rewarded by the swift application of the red whip of chastity.
Know _You
it is clear that the evolutionist is so tied to his religion that he cannot think objectively - so here i issue a challenge of a general nature.
let us develop a focussed discussion in which we agree ahead of time which sub-topic of this noxious subject we address first.. i will take the liberty of suggesting the following:.
given the almost inevitable and immediate degeneration that debates about creation and evolution seem to descend into, how about we address the sociological aspects first - to clear the ground, as it were: how would you feel (whether creationist or apostate evolutionist dog) if incontravertible evidence emerged that the "other" side was actually right?
Wasa,
I am still singularly stupified by your daringly deadly description of the colored collar of calumny that would engorge my turgid and tumescent tour de force. Distraction of your decadent derisible desires towards anyone but your magnificent master - no matter how innocenly inclined - leads to a great swarming of sedulous sentiments in my burning bosom of burnished brass. Cease, damn dastardly wicked woman and cleave closely to the one who whets with whabandon your womanly wappetite and bring your friends!
KY
Edited by - Know_You on 20 October 2002 22:43:59
it is clear that the evolutionist is so tied to his religion that he cannot think objectively - so here i issue a challenge of a general nature.
let us develop a focussed discussion in which we agree ahead of time which sub-topic of this noxious subject we address first.. i will take the liberty of suggesting the following:.
given the almost inevitable and immediate degeneration that debates about creation and evolution seem to descend into, how about we address the sociological aspects first - to clear the ground, as it were: how would you feel (whether creationist or apostate evolutionist dog) if incontravertible evidence emerged that the "other" side was actually right?
It is clear that the evolutionist is so tied to his religion that he cannot think objectively - so here I issue a challenge of a general nature. Let us develop a focussed discussion in which we agree ahead of time which sub-topic of this noxious subject we address first.
I will take the liberty of suggesting the following:
Given the almost inevitable and immediate degeneration that debates about Creation and Evolution seem to descend into, how about we address the sociological aspects first - to clear the ground, as it were: how would you feel (whether Creationist or apostate evolutionist dog) if incontravertible evidence emerged that the "other" side was actually right? Evolutionists - honest replies only, that is if you have an honest bone in your bodies. Creationists, naturally your replies will be honest and as pure as the driven snow. In a pistachio nutshell (we are in the Golden State after all)....how would you feel and react?
LOL - let's see how these atheistic dogs yelp and howl now that they have been called out!
KY
Edited by - Know_You on 20 October 2002 21:52:30
any of you evolutionists ever crunch the numbers?
Come on pomegranate, my man! You are giving Creationists a bad name through your ill conceived and shifting arguments. The whole basis of the probability argument rests on the mistaken notion that the lifeforms we see on Earth are the only ones possible, even in principle! As I demonstrated earlier, the odds that you were born are so miniscule that clearly you must have been not born at all but created directly by God - as Zechariah seems to think he was - although given his Gladstonian "weakness" it is a bit odd that special creation would hardwire in such apalling defects. But, with Avogadro's number being as big as it is much is possible - do you know Sir pomegranate how big that number is and what it means?
I strongly suggest you consult my excellent essay if you really are desirous of doing real damage to the evolutionist's cause by your focussing on the facts. The facts man! The facts.
Explain to them why trilobites once dominated and then became extinct. Rub the facts in their faces. Provide a concise explanation for why 99% of the creatures that God created are now extinct - thrown into the dustbin of history, no doubt for their failings of the flesh. Explain why there used to be dinosaurs and sabre-toothed tigers but that there are none now, whereas mammals that we have now they did not have then. What a confusing world it can be. But not for you - Baffle 'em with your ready grasp of the data as you explain how it could be that the worm C. elegans and humans both feature a gene that renders each susceptible to the wonders of prozac. That the genetic code of the loathsome and flea ridden mus musculus and the upstanding Christian man are pretty much the same.
And, my dear fellow, while you're at it, shower them with sharply shaped explanations as to how the vast diversity of life - including the predilection of kangaroos for the antipodes - arose so swiftly after Noah's flood - that fine, nostalgic day when God destroyed all heathen miscreants in a mighty and terrible day of judgment - stay tuned, for a second installment of Divine Vengeance is coming to a neihboorhood near you. An historic moment yet in the future. LOL.
Hope that helps,
\Know_You
part iii of the annual on the road again, down from the fountain (of truth) series.. - from half-moon bay california - .
owing to mechanical problems, mrs know_you and i have had to delay our plans for the day.
the missus kindly agreed to sit in the repair shop awaiting the re-emergence of our means of conveyance, which may take all day, while i have decided to sacrifice part of my vacation to address the subject of evolution.
Dearest Alan,
I shall consider your kind invite most carefully - it is truly heartening that your womenfolk have prepared the Chilli and, I assume, the Turkey- but what of the post-prandial delights - have they considered that - will the mighty Lord of MacCallan receive his wee invite in all good time?? Answer me that YE sassenach of the eastern hills...
KYishJello
my dear know_you: .
having been moved by your recent posts, i find myself terrified by my precarious position as one associated with scurrilous apostate scum.
i have supped at the table of demons, cavorted with the devious likes of farkle, alanf, seven006, ginnytosken, and others of their ilk.
RedHorseWoman,
Now come on - Ben & Jerry's indeed! The very antithesis of logic, and yet the very tithesis of what makes too many woman tick - the love of fat...need I say more...????? The antidote to men is not fat but dermined argument since, in reality, most men, are full of shit - and I mean that seriously ...
KY
my dear know_you: .
having been moved by your recent posts, i find myself terrified by my precarious position as one associated with scurrilous apostate scum.
i have supped at the table of demons, cavorted with the devious likes of farkle, alanf, seven006, ginnytosken, and others of their ilk.
ps: wasasister - hmmmmm....email me and I will attempt to lift you from the depths to which you have sunken - but it could take many hours, perhaps even days of, intensive rehabilitation....
my dear know_you: .
having been moved by your recent posts, i find myself terrified by my precarious position as one associated with scurrilous apostate scum.
i have supped at the table of demons, cavorted with the devious likes of farkle, alanf, seven006, ginnytosken, and others of their ilk.
Dear All,
Flattered as I am by you perorations, I have to admit that I am, and have been, until now, a one-woman man. But your posts have raised up the God-blessed image of Abraham...need I say more? So, much as I am enamored by the perigrenations of y'all - whom I hold in the deepest respet, you nust either decide amongst yourselves who shall be first - or cnvince me that you all shall, simultaneously deserve that honor - but I do declare that Mrs Know_You and I, being serious students of the Bible, will not be easily swayed - however, pictures and bank account statements will be -- to an extent - considered. At least by me.
KY