Yes in the states we have the History Channel and it does quite a lot of history of engineering and ships and all that good stuff -- not justUS stuff either -- there have been a number about constructing the channel tunnel etc.
stillajwexelder
JoinedPosts by stillajwexelder
-
-
-
8
Underhanded Means and Trickery
by dawn27 indid the elders ever try to trick you into saying too much or even trick you into having to meet with them after you said that you wouldn't?
here is my dilema: i have been inactive for about 18 mnths and moved out of the area, got a new phone number, ect.
i have had the best of both worlds, a good relationship with my family (because i'm not df'd or da'd) and freedom from the borg.
-
stillajwexelder
I was asked by the elders to befriend a brother and later he was disfellwoshipped for apostasy -- then I was made an elder myself -- and where theocratic warfare strategy is involved believe me -- the policy is - - if in doubt disfellowship -- ask questions later -- you are right to be paranoid -- they will be quite willing to lie through their teeth -and an elders wife is classed as a valid 2nd witness - so be careful please
TNF (Trust No F----r)
-
-
stillajwexelder
Can not get BBC2 in the USA so I will go to the local bar(pub)
-
13
Jesus did recognize and use God's name.....but, it wasn't jehovah
by Holey_Cheeses*King_of_the juice. inthat's right - like so many scriptural verses which have been corrupted by translation and interpretation over the centuries, so too has the defining scripture where jesus clearly identified gods name.
of course, that verse is the so called model prayer, and contrary to the beliefs of many it does highlight god's name.. as jesus said -"let us pray then this way - our father who art in heaven, harold be thy name....... so once again, the witnesses have got it wrong.
they should refer to themselves as harold's witnesses, and they should be doing harry's will.
-
stillajwexelder
noticed Yeheshua, in the "Insight" volumes, but think it suspect.
The name is identical to Joshua, but some prefer a pronunciation of Yahshua (Yah [saves/is salvation]).As for the Father's name - Jesus isn't recorded as repeating it.
Little Toe you are correct of course -- but honestly -I did not get Yeheshua ben Joseph from the Insight book -- I got it from "When Jesus Became God" and sadly I can not remember the author -
-
5
Watchtower Lubrary CD
by Joker10 in.
i want to get a hold of one.
anybody know if it can be downloaded from somewhere?
-
stillajwexelder
The latest version can be copied to a hard drive --so once you have a copy youy can put it on hard drive and then give it back to the owner
-
72
Troublesome Trinity Verses Part 2
by hooberus inon a previous thread many other "troublesome" verses have been brought up.
i will take some of these and start theads for them.
due to the complexity of the subject, several threads each covering one or two verses will be started, lord willing.
-
stillajwexelder
hey guys -- come on -- calm down -- I have calmed down on the trinity -- I also appologized to little toe for being bigotted -- an always remember sarcasm is the lowest form of wit -- I feel like being sarcastic to trinitarians but at least we can offer points of view -- we could not do that in the Watchtower now could we
-
67
Your favorite artists?
by berylblue inokay...my evil reactionary brother in law is one of my faves.... .
this talented bastard won every award when he was at the pa academy of fine arts.
i love his work.
-
stillajwexelder
Monet -- and basically all the impressionists
-
29
biggest WTBTS threat
by stillajwexelder insorry if there has already been a thread on this subject.
do you think a really big threat to the wtbts is from people like me who are still witnesses and in the organization but also post on this board and have an open mind -- or do you think there are bigger threats -and if so what would they be?
-
stillajwexelder
mizpah said
I'm just curious. What keeps you in the organization? If you know it is not "the truth" what possible reason is there to stay in it? Do you think you can help others? Do you think you can bring about a change in the organization?
I know the last few meetings I attended before leaving were agonizing to me. I remember waiting for the first scripture to be cited at the Public Talk so I would have an excuse of reading the Bible for the rest of the hour. I finally just stopped attending because I had such a critical view of everything that was going on. I couldn't stand it a moment longer.
I am getting to that stage -- biggest reason family -- I know I am being a hypocrite -- and I am trying to have the best of both worlds-- in the meantime just gathering info from you guys on this board -- scrptures to use etc
-
13
Jesus did recognize and use God's name.....but, it wasn't jehovah
by Holey_Cheeses*King_of_the juice. inthat's right - like so many scriptural verses which have been corrupted by translation and interpretation over the centuries, so too has the defining scripture where jesus clearly identified gods name.
of course, that verse is the so called model prayer, and contrary to the beliefs of many it does highlight god's name.. as jesus said -"let us pray then this way - our father who art in heaven, harold be thy name....... so once again, the witnesses have got it wrong.
they should refer to themselves as harold's witnesses, and they should be doing harry's will.
-
stillajwexelder
Probably Yahweh and of course Jesus is not Jesus butYeheshua ben Joseph -- we can not have it all ways if Jehovah's name is not Jehovah , Jesus's name is not Jesus
-
133
Troublesome Trinity Verses Part 1
by hooberus inin this series i hope to discuss some common verses used by the watchtower to "disprove" the trinity and deity of the lord jesus christ.
the first one is 1 corinthians 8:6: .
"but to us there is but one god, the father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one lord jesus christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
-
stillajwexelder
I am sorry Hooberus - I am not going to post on this subject anymore - it just the biggest load of trash - sorry if that is not an intellectual reply