I find the accounts in Judges disturbing, but historical accounts are different from other puzzling/disturbing accounts. For example, you'll find nowhere in Judges that God commanded those behaviors; the events are simply recorded as what people did, the phrase "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" being the major theme from whence all the action sprang. Some of the stories (like Judges 11) seem (to me) to be written to show just how crazy the story could get, with all of society getting involved: threatening visitors, sexual violence, frozen-cold indifference, careless oaths, war, kidnapping... yahoo! We're capable of all kinds of fun.
Harder verses are the ones which we have trouble understanding from the cultural/historical context. Harder because we think that Western "2007" current values are the epitome of all values, and that God should have known that back then and given them all 2007 values back then if He were really doing things right. But I wager that in a few years things we might see changes like polygamy will being a new right, incest being 'private choice', public sex being protected "speech", infanticide being permissible for economic reasons, and so on. And we will think that 2007 was archaic in understanding morality. Morality seems to be a moving target when we look at history and culture.
The hardest verses (and the ones I am drawn to) are the ones where God seems to contradict Himself. Was God lying in Genesis? Perhaps not. Fellowship with God is possibly life of the most important kind--and their fellowship was destroyed immediately. (I notice that God didn't abandon them during the following years, either.) ...Awakened's point about God ordering an image to be made, in order to be healed, is an anomaly, yet is rich with content. I think it gives a nudge to what trinitarians say about Christ being the reflection of God, or a kind of interface, which is easier for us to connect with than a vague "sky" God. It's food for thought.
bebu