Good morning Realist. I trust the day finds you well.
As I said with those who support the "third way" of socialism also called the chaos theroy/or neo-marxists simply have it wrong. They always have. Socialism will always fail. There can't be a bridge where Socialism leads and capitalism is secondary. However, a Capitalistic system with a welfare state works quite well; So long as the welfare state is kept in check. You should never check the right of indviduals or business to spur new capital. Not lasie-faire capitalism as the US exports to other regions but capitalism as is practiced inside the US. I've recomended "World on Fire" before to cover this area. The idea that the State is more efficent than the private sector is, well, not true. But there will always be managerialists who fight for the right to have power. (I hate bureucrates)
The rift is vast between those who support the EU ideology and those who laugh at it. I believe it (The dream of a untied europe) will fail in my lifetime. You don't. (I assume) We will see in time. (Unless you see the future in a cereal bowl. I don't)
Mr. Gates believes that a super tax upon the rich of WS will lead it out of a resession. Most economists disagree with that concept. (As I understand it) Supporting an increase in sales tax, incorperating an income tax, and increasing cooperate & business taxes probably won't help. But, it is sure to hurt. Why do so many millionares and some (gates) billionaries settle in WS? Mr. Gates is quite concerned with the poor yes. But his ideals settle better in Europe than here.
i fail to see how high minimum wages would be directly linked to a budget deficit.
If you do not understand this basic fact of economics I am wasting my time. Not because it's not important but because you perhaps haven't had much experience in ecomonics in reality.
to give immigrants a house seems indeed extraordinarily generous.
Oh no no you misunderstand not true houses. No, they, the State, for millions and millions provide glorified tents for temporary housing. State run programing at it's best. And they cover less than 10% of migrant/immigrant workers during the peak of seasons. And I agree, they need to change their policy.
if there are not enough jobs available the only possible conclusion is to not allow them to enter the state.
Isolationism, it's an option. But illegal immigration is still a huge problem. And to just exclude the poor doesn't that fly in the face of Socialism? It flies in the face of America. We need to change our immigration laws. My opinion is to reward legal immgration and punish illegal aliens. A sociologiest once asked me why Cuban's get instant immigration status when Mexicans don't. It was an intresting debate.
you mean the US should go back to this habit? what would that mean to the already poorly developed democratic system? Go back.
Ha like 2/3rds of congress will ever agree on something that would give away so much state ( & special interests) power. We are a Republic not a democracy. Any sane person does not want to live in a democracy any more than a dictatorship. And yes liberals do want to live in a democracy and despise the Republic. I think that Ann Coulter my have a point about them.
the US has the lowest social security and international aid spendings in the western world. on the other hand the highest defense budget and one of the highest costs on prisions. that money could be put to better use.
As I said the 'western world' meaning the EU standards can't be maintained. Immigration to boost numbers and offset the retiring babyboomers might help in the EU. But, hatred of immigrants will put need of workers and bigotry/fear of loss of culture at odds. I don't think that the US 'meger' welfare' system can continue without reform either.
Yes defense, guns, war machines, bombs, some 250 billion. Prisions lock'em up. Big money in both. We don't go far enough; Minus the death penalty, I'm with you there. But, probably not for the same reasons. I'm all for killing the bad guys. But state executions are to expensive. Thugs are not worth a million dollars a peice to fry em. A bullet costs about 14 cents. Capital Punishment is to expensive. And it is big money to put on a Capital punishment crime case. If it were really about public deterence they would make executions public. Also, if you were to remove robbery where homicide results from the crime meaning that executions were not an option avalable to the State a lot of problems would be solved. Life in prison, yes. Save execution for the worst of the worst and that's all.
So how much is enough?
enough so that they can live a very simple life. they should be able to afford a small apartment in a cheap area and have enough money for food. Every immigrant into America should recieve a check for?
So anyone who does not make say $40,000 a year should just state how much they made and request a check from the state for the difference? The US gives away food both domesticly and abroad. Oh wait, never mind, you talked about that on another thread.
do not prevent crimes. security, education and equal chances prevent crimes. the higher the living standard the lower the crime rate. It's why I support self defense laws.
self defense laws are absolutely ok. europe is too restrictive in that case imo. In the US crime and criminals are treated to gently.
This flies in the face of white collar crime. Greed is the modivation for crime. Stealing a loaf of bread because you are starving is not what we are talking about. In the US we have a culture where if your friend had a gun he carried illegally would most Americans tell the police? No, it seems they don't. But I not only would, I did. And I would again. All people do not have the rights to even posses a gun much less carry it on them. You have to register youself with the FBI including fingerprinting that is kept on file with the government forever. Also gangs should be treated just like the mob. That is what they are "organized crime." They should be treated as such. So many gun related homicide deaths are gang related.
Thanks for understanding my point on europe and self defense restriction. Personally, I think it clouds the minds of the citizens. Europe is to passive. But that was the goal. In the US we do not hold people responsible for themselves. There is no talk about responsibility to each other or the State. We also do not challenge ourselves enough. (Meaning education.) We need to walk the walk and stop being such slackers. jmo
I think that duty and honor are become back in style. Patriotism and true responsibility are no longer things that liberal minds can use to put people down. That means that liberal ideals of socialism will get the toliet and individualism will come about again. This will not sit well with the desire of a UN with a world tax (meaning taxing Americans to redistribute to nations favored by the UN) with a standing army (Funded and supplied by the US) and a world court (To be used to create endless grandstanding against the US and her allies by dictator nations).
I read an article "End open enrollment into the UN." It was in a chopper magazine of all places. But it was the best I've read yet. If I find in online I'll PM it to you.