So, my question about memes was simple; have they been scientifically proven?
I don't think they have been "proven." They are a concept. Atheism is not dependent upon memes being proven scientifically. In actuality atheism is a position of non-belief. It is not dependent upon anything. Theism is a position that claims something (God exists) and is therefore a position that requires evidence.
Belief in anything should be scientifically proven first, according to a Dawkinite's world view.
I don't agree with this. Some ideas are not totally radical and are logically built on other proven ideas. If they are consistent with other knowledge they may be considered "potentially valid" even before being "proven" true. The amount of evidence required before an idea is given any credence is directly related to how "extraordinary" the claim is.
Do you consider this meme idea to be "extraordinary"? I don't. And like I said, my current worldview is not dependent upon the idea of memes being proven or disproven. I find it wild that you compare the meme concept to the "existence of God." Isn't that concept quite critical to your worldview?
Eerily similar to the flip flopping of the WTS)
Sigh... here we go, comparing a side you disagree with as being "like the WTS." A favored, weak tactic of many JWN debaters.