abbagail
Oh Abaddon, Abaddon... laugh away... and enjoy it while you can...
Your namesake gives away your allegiance, so who is surprised at your attitude?
Revelation 9:11 -- And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew [is] Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.
What makes you think it is my namesake? Silly human fool! Bwahahahaha! Bwahahahaha! I and my demon children will come to you in the night!! Bwahahahah! The black helicopters have been dispatched and are hovering silently outside your home!!!
Look, seek professional help, okay? My mate Neil is not Jesus, he's mentally ill. You do not have a unique insight on the Bible and current history, you are mentally ill.
Brother Apostate
Are you seriously saying you believe that the theory of natural selection originates from the occult? Or was that ironic?
zagor
That is an interesting comment by you Abaddon, I would still appreciate if you submit your thoughts in a respectful manner.
Why? Should I pander to delusional conspiracists or those who believe that they have a unique scriptural insight?
I started this thread and do not ridicule any opinion no matter how extreme they may appear to me.
Good for you. I see equal value in calling spades spades.
I wanted to have a frank and open discussion about it. Ridiculing something just shuts down the investigation.
I ridiculed one thing in particular;
At least there are a couple of sane voices. Some, however, seem to have learned nothing about the dangers of sub-moronic Biblical numerology or the standards of evidence that extraordinary claims should have. Such people are so caught up in their own end-times psycho drama they miss the obvious faults in what passes for their 'logic'.
By all means let me know whether you believe in such nonsense; if you don't, please let me know why you feel taking delusional people seriously is a good idea.
And that is what this board is all about to help people deal with certain issues not to shut them down, because if you do you are more likely to solidify their beliefs in things that may appear on fringe to you.
From experience I disagree. You get nowhere by pandering or being condescending to people and making them think you take them seriously. Only by making people examine their beliefs, defend their beliefs, do you have any chance of having them become receptive to change. You might feel subterfuge is the best way for this, you're not clear. I feel honesty is best. I have a friend who went through a messianic phase a while back; smacking his nonsense right back at him was the best thing I could have done; underneath any prevailing mental condition, these people aren't normally stupid you know.
As regards Gemini 5, well; Cooper has alleged the US government was covering up UFO's...
Most people realise when they think about it that what we have in the shops now is often available to some extent in prototype form maybe 20 years previously.
Whether it is this that lies at the heart of the story, or Cooper's imagination conflating later satellite photography with what he did then, I don't know.
Here's an example of what we know NOW was state-of-the-art in the mid 1960's;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Janeskh11leakedphoto.jpg
This would have been achieved with a 2.3m mirror giving about 6" theoretical resolution; not quite good enough for a number plate. Whatever photographic equipment Gemini 5 had, it didn't include a camera like that; Gemini was the size of a VW Beetle.
Of course, this is from very low Earth orbit. And time-over-target for such is low; orbital times would be c. 1.5-2 hours. Geo-sync satellites have infinite time-over-target but poorer resolution being around 100 times further away.
As with the Bildenburg group, most room for speculation is removed by a little bit of research. Physics is a good starting point to determine the capabilities of spy satellites.