No wonder so many people get fleeced by the unscurpulous if people believe stuff like this is real.
If a bunch of TV people can easily get such amasing 'evidence', then how come such amasing claims for ghostie activity have never been validated when investigated by genuine scientists?
Come on people, have a little self-respect. THINK. It's entertainment. It as scientific and rigourous as Brainiac. As truthful as an election promise.
Just because your like the idea of ghosties being real doesn't make it true. Eye witness evidence is NOT reliable, not even yours. If there was any truth in the claims how come all it ever is is eyewitness evidence and stuff that doesn't happen the minute it's credible scientists looking at it??
No pro-ghostie has ever proved a thing (other than their own credulity) not once ever, and none of the pro-ghosties crew here will do anything other than complain about the attitude of skeptics, whine about unfairness, or make excuses why scientists can't duplicate such results. The usual suspects are at it, once again. Wooo! Behind you!!! Pff!!
How come people have this massive double standard here? Dubbies are dumb for beleving in demonised smurfs but TV shows must be believed with the forocity of a resident of JonesTown's enthusiasm for KoolAid? You what?
If they are stupid in beleiving silly supersticious nonsense that has no evidence to support it, what are the people who ALSO believe other silly supersticious nonsense that has no evidence to support it? Be consistent.
Effervescent
What I don't understand is why anyone would insult those who choose to watch it?
Oh no, I wouldn't insult any one who watched it. I only insult people who are credulous enough to believe that rubbish is real. I insult Dubbies for beliving in demonised Smurfs. I would be a hypocrite if I didn't insult equally slack-brained nonsense.
Warlock
I suppose I should start threads with real intelligent titles like, "Technical and Fundamental Stock Market Analysis" "Theories on Stock Market Speculation" "Candlestick Charting" "Hedging with Puts and Calls".
Is that enough, or do you want more?
In threads like that you could provide evidence what you say is true. Other people could apply trhe same techniques and have similar results.
Now, why not compare your ghostie beliefs (which you cannot provide evidence for and which yield different results for different people when identical techniques are used) with something they can be fairly compared to, like demonised smurfs?