When do you ever see the authority and jurisdiction of the congregation discussed and elevated like this?
Uhh...Can you say never? So what makes this so different? Why would they subcontract to the congregations these precious and important matters and marks of true Christianity? (I think we know why)
Consider also that the first century "governing body" got involved with that widow situation, like mentioned in paragraph 13:
"Later, a situation developed locally. It was reported that certain “widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution” of food. So the apostles directed the appointment of qualified men who, in turn, made arrangements to ensure that the widows’ needs were adequately and equitably met."
Doesn't this set a precedent? Shouldn't the GB today be setting up committees to handle these needs of the sheep?
Nope. Not according to them. These things are not of their concern.
It is clear what the message of this article is:
"Don't call us for money!"
"Quit screwin' with our best employees.... I mean .....er.... full time servants over this silly parent stuff."
Their self-serving dribble is getting worse and worse.
It is clear they have a very warped view of money. They see the publishers as an endless well of funds that can be tapped anytime. The GB and writing staff have no clue what it takes to make money out here in the real world.
And they sure as heck never take any responsibility for creating these late-in-life financial disasters and obviously feel no obligation before their God to do anything about it.