Kind of, sort of.
I've learned a lot from people's anger at Old testament Jehovah's actions. Never really thought much about how big a wank he really was, including when he supposedly had a she-bear shuffle out and kill 42 children because some prophet was called "baldy-waldy" and couldn't handle it.
Or Lot offering his daughters to the nest of rapists outside his door, in order to protect his male (allegedly angels-with-no-powers) guests. And then he has sex with those same daughters later on, who conveniently give birth to literal rival/enemy nations of Israel. Uh huh. Of course it was scheming women who are to blame for that, too.
Or how the one patriarch didn't want his sons to give a woman a child in the name of her dead husband. When his male children kept dying because of being forbidden to give her a baby in the womb, she dolled herself up as a harlot and had sex with the patriarch instead.
And of course none of the men throughout the bible are counted as "whores" or "harlots" for sleeping with multiple partners. just like modern day prostitution: only the prostitutes are commiting a crime and almost never the "john".
Speaking of "Johns": when was the last time the WT named anyone/thing as part of the supposed "John-class"?
Hmmm...