Wow, waiting, that's a pretty good estimation of how it happens, IMO. The mothers DO just need a little time for themselves. I've seen many times where the single mother with son has a nice servant brother approach and offer to take the boy in service. The mother ALWAYS says yes. Only one time did I ever hear one say no, and she was not a single mother--she has a good husband. The other mothers are an easy situation for a molester on his mark to take advantage of. It would only be seen as being kind.
AMAC, I don't believe the Org is any different in the opportunities it presents to a pedophile, either. Any church, club, school could be seen as easy prey. The difference is in how the offender is dealt with. Waiting's remark about not speaking of the abuse or offense to anyone EVER is also on the mark. I don't know where this "many people" were allowed to talk about an accused, but I can tell you, it's exceedingly rare. NO ONE is allowed to talk about what happens behind the closed doors of a judicial committee. It's official policy. Not the accused, not the accuser, not the Committee. If you break that rule and tell, you will be disciplined. As well, I have sat through the talks where counsel is strongly given about gossip and slander in the congregation. I've also sat through the stupid "forgiveness" talk when the offender is welcomed back with open arms after their stint in jail.
Personally, I don't care for BB's term "pedophile paradise" either, but for different reason. The fact that the term is in use indicates there is an ongoing serious problem with protecting the so-called "privacy" of the molester. In not allowing his beastly actions to come out, the pedophile is able to not only save face, but if a sociopathic offender, manipulate things so he can easily offend again. I belief that just as registered sex offenders must notify the neighbors in the area that he lives, convicted offenders in the congregation should be noted publicly, so children can be protected. This should happen in the case of judicial committee "conviction," and especially in criminal court convictions.
Only then do I see any hope of coming out from under that label. Even the Catholic Church has begun to withdraw the umbrella of financial support and ecclesiastical privilege from offenders in its ranks. Can JWs, who claim to be Jehovah's pure, clean Organization do any less? To make that claim, while harboring that filth in secret is revolting beyond words.
Odrade