You probably wouldn't understand a peer reviewed article of Quantum Mechanics why do I say this? Answer below:
Calling people stupid doesn't make you look smarter. It just shows you have no argument.
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
64
Human Brain And Quantum Physics
by frankiespeakin inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th4q9r2m8ss.
-
-
Viviane
-
64
Human Brain And Quantum Physics
by frankiespeakin inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th4q9r2m8ss.
-
-
Viviane
So I suspect critics of this video to be not that far along on the subject matter to make a legitimite argument for or against. Is there any one here ready to collect the prize of valid criticisim based on what credentials they have for speaking with knowledge of these discovered properties of quanta with mathematical grammar?
Calling people stupid for pointing out thinly disguised woo doesn't put you in any position to know what you are talking about.
-
45
Connections: remarkable sounds of the past, still seen, reproducible and tsunamis
by prologos injust venting:.
there are a string of news items that come together in my mind to help me visualize what happened by way of connections.. the news of the inflationary stage of the early universe triggering gravity waves, that appear in our sensors like a pattern against the background.. the sale of the stradivarius viola still making unsurpassed glorious sounds after 300 years and going for 45 kk.
inflation?.
-
-
Viviane
No worries. You haven't been holding me back. Perhaps instead of TV you can spend some time answering the questions I posed!
-
28
The best explanation of Matthew 24 and 'This Generation', that I've read so far
by Island Man inhttp://meletivivlon.com/2014/04/02/this-generation-a-new-premise/.
-
-
Viviane
And it did come true exactly as foretold.
There is no proof he actually said that.
-
34
Order in the universe
by Rattigan350 inthis topic was covered in book study last night.
some commented that the universe is ordered and the stars don't collide.. that has nothing to do with order.
it is more to do with that there is more space between the stars and planets and things go between them if they were in the same area.. and do they not consider that the many things that colliided with the moon to make those crators?.
-
-
Viviane
I find that claim very hard to believe. What's the hottest temperature ever achieved on Earth by artificial means and was it impossible for humans to survive within miles of that temperature achievement?
Why do you assume it's all about temperature?
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
-
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
-
Viviane
look at the nearly impossible rings of Saturn paper-thin at the scale of 2 football fields
This statement is born of ignorance. Many objects in our solar system have rings.
-
45
Connections: remarkable sounds of the past, still seen, reproducible and tsunamis
by prologos injust venting:.
there are a string of news items that come together in my mind to help me visualize what happened by way of connections.. the news of the inflationary stage of the early universe triggering gravity waves, that appear in our sensors like a pattern against the background.. the sale of the stradivarius viola still making unsurpassed glorious sounds after 300 years and going for 45 kk.
inflation?.
-
-
Viviane
it is just that on this thread we have an interesting and unusual way of gaining an education and that is by observing the patterning of natural phenomena.
Please explain what patterns of natural phenomena you are observing.
prologos is simply looking for rationalist explanations - why is that a problem?
It's not a problem if that were what he were doing. What he IS doing is misrepresenting facts, science in general and insisting things that are demonstrably false are true and refusing to do any work.
If gravitational waves turn out to be true and the scientists are able to defend it rigorously it would demonstrate that early cosmologists were definitely on to something and had grasped these ideas brilliantly.
Please explain what ideas and which early cosmologists you are talking about.
-
34
Order in the universe
by Rattigan350 inthis topic was covered in book study last night.
some commented that the universe is ordered and the stars don't collide.. that has nothing to do with order.
it is more to do with that there is more space between the stars and planets and things go between them if they were in the same area.. and do they not consider that the many things that colliided with the moon to make those crators?.
-
-
Viviane
Just show them this.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_collision
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
-
Viviane
so S&R i and those concerned:: if you are really interested and to seriously read, I checked my figures, and they are CORRECT. rechecked, google it please.
So, in the interest of accuracy, if you claim these are YOUR numbers, then please show your work. Otherwise, please show a citation.
Bode nos. are expressed in 1/10 AU. Astronomical units. No orbit is more than 5% off the bode/titius prediction. look at it please. if you have other numbers they are bogus.
So, you haven't define specifically what you intend the bode number to mean. Please do that. You own chart appears to simultaneously use AU and and 1/10th AU units. Is there a reason for that? Did you compare your numbers with NASA? I am just wanting to make sure that when you say any other numbers are bogus, you have a good solid foundation for saying so, particularly since you said no orbit was off more than 5% of predicted except for the two that were.
Which is it? Some or none?
Caedes, debunk the numbers yourself, do not use a spokesman please.
8 planets in a geometric progression sequence within 5% accuracy. a doubling 7 times , 2^8?
Quite an amusing position to take since you have yet to show any work or citations and can't count properly. It's 7 planets that come close, that two are way out of proportion.