Enough to know that there are two possibilities of the existence of matter/energy, both are infinite.
There are far more possibilites. You should explore the issue further.
It's an interesting perspective that I heard from him on a 2hr religous debate with sam harris, christopher hitchen, daniel dennet, etc. Just regurgitating something I heard from that clip yesterday, you would have to watch it to really get what i was trying to say. Must he be an astrophysicist to make a valid claim about the universe?
Why is his opinion relevant? You've not answered that. Was his claim valid, testable, something already known or was he trying to merge his own poor understanding of science with theology?
I was reffering to the inability to see or measure the physical properties of dark matter since its existence is an inferred hypothesis.
It was predicted in the 1930's and it's a verified, objective and measurable fact that something is out there.