Posts by Viviane

130

Atheist Miracles

by Perry in

jw
friends

i reworded a variation of a common critique of atheists to my own liking.

no, i do not hate atheists, i love them!

they keep me from getting bored.

Viviane

Were you aware that a new study seems to confirm the cosmological constant?

So what? In what way does that change your ignorance of science or dishonesty about your religion?

This puts atheists in the ironic position of believing in the very same things that they claim not to believe in because of lack of evidence.

Yes. We get it. You don't understand science or logic or, really, anything you talk about. It's no different that being determined to show the world you can poop by pooping in front of everyone. When you're three, it's amusing and something you get congratulating for. Pooping your determined and self imposed ignorance and lack of understanding anything at your age is just horrible for everyone involved.

9

This Good News of the Kingdom - Zion's Watchtower - Zionism - The End

by LAWHFol in

i hope you're all doing well.. i haven't written for a while, my previous screen name was objectivetruth btw.

i look forward to resuming some good conversations with my jw.com family.. i haven't been active much of late, however a topic that i have continued to consider & study is modern day israel & the early watchtower's teachings on this topic.. this is part 1 - i'll post multiple posts, to help readers follow my train of thought.. first i'll cover the teachings and overall belief's of the watchtower on the jew's , israel, and god's plan for the jew's.. i've read a lot of the early publications.

the 2 most insightful publications, for me to read were (links to the book's in pdf format highlighted in blue) :.

Viviane

One thing I'll say before responding, is I have no Agenda, and I have no Bias.

Well that clearly is not true. You are attempting to show that the WT is false and your points are valid. There is nothing wrong with having agenda.

However on the Other end, it seems like It HAS to be a Start of the Proper State of Israel, which will eventually turn into Zion.

*sigh* ... this is why discussing things with Christians like wrestling with an eel covered in oil. In an earlier post you called it undeniable proof of the fulfillment of prophecy. Now it HAS to the the start of what will eventually fulfill the prophecy.

This is why Christians use the word "proof" so wrong. Everything is proof of the interpretation until suddenly it's not.

The Hebrew words used in place of Moment are pa·'am e·chat; - Meaning "All at Once" The Significant part of Isaiah 66:8 is "e·chad, be·yo·vm" or "in one Day"
Focusing on the "One Day" 1948 Definitively matches the Description - May 14 1948: The term of the British Mandate ends. The State of Israel is established at 4 pm on May 14, 1948

And "all at once" also doesn't mean "in one day". Focusing on what words actually mean, so far nothing you've used matches objective reality. This is purely just your ideas layered on top of poetic language that, without the benefit of hindsight, would give you no clue as to the "prophecy".
I obviously didn't predict any of these Events, I didn't even know the first thing about them for most of my life. Sometimes Men Prophesy, and other Times Men Translate Prophecy
You miss the point. You say these "prophecies" that foretell the future have fulfillment. They don't. They are just poetic language. You are fitting past events to vague language. Without the benefit of history, simply reading the prophecy, there is absolutely no way anyone could, 50 years before the events happened, match the events you claim fulfilled to the prophecy to the prophecy.

What are your thoughts on this Prediction?
My thoughts are that you are matching vague language to events with the benefit of foresight.
For instance. A jubilee was one year. It happened in 50 year cycles, meaning 8 jubilees would actually be 8 years, not 400. Also, he didn't give dates, so get one number correct is certainly possible purely with luck. Also, you're incorrectly attempting to claim "no man's land" applies to all of Israel when your specific example involves only the Palestinian debate. Also, it's always been inhabited.
Without making up a lot of things, using weird and twisted definitions and pretzel logic, there is no way to make it fit.

9

This Good News of the Kingdom - Zion's Watchtower - Zionism - The End

by LAWHFol in

i hope you're all doing well.. i haven't written for a while, my previous screen name was objectivetruth btw.

i look forward to resuming some good conversations with my jw.com family.. i haven't been active much of late, however a topic that i have continued to consider & study is modern day israel & the early watchtower's teachings on this topic.. this is part 1 - i'll post multiple posts, to help readers follow my train of thought.. first i'll cover the teachings and overall belief's of the watchtower on the jew's , israel, and god's plan for the jew's.. i've read a lot of the early publications.

the 2 most insightful publications, for me to read were (links to the book's in pdf format highlighted in blue) :.

Viviane

How do you interpret / View these Scriptures

I don't interpret them. I simply look at them and ask "Did this happen exactly as described with specific details?"

The answer is no. The U.N. created the nation of Israel as it exists today, not god. It's a secular nation, not a theocracy as the bible indicates it would be. Zion in labor is not in any way a description of Jews declaring independence, a 24 hour day is not a moment. All of that is simply YOU trying to layer your specific interpretation of vague and poetic language onto specific events. Nothing more.

If you still place any trust in the Bible, I'm interested to hear your views on these scriptures, If not, I can show you some other occurrences, that I view as proofs.

You viewing something as proof doesn't make it actual proof. I would advise you to read the scriptures, the prophecies purely as written and then attempt to determine if, without your knowledge of history, if there is anyway you could possibly have predicted specifically the events you claim match.

If not, it's not actually prophecy then, is it?

9

This Good News of the Kingdom - Zion's Watchtower - Zionism - The End

by LAWHFol in

i hope you're all doing well.. i haven't written for a while, my previous screen name was objectivetruth btw.

i look forward to resuming some good conversations with my jw.com family.. i haven't been active much of late, however a topic that i have continued to consider & study is modern day israel & the early watchtower's teachings on this topic.. this is part 1 - i'll post multiple posts, to help readers follow my train of thought.. first i'll cover the teachings and overall belief's of the watchtower on the jew's , israel, and god's plan for the jew's.. i've read a lot of the early publications.

the 2 most insightful publications, for me to read were (links to the book's in pdf format highlighted in blue) :.

Viviane

The Ra-gathering of the Jew's to Israel in the Years of 1917,1948,1967 , is in my View an Undeniable Miracle & Fulfillment of many Hebrew Scripture prophecies, These fulfillment's are Unlike,shaky and haphazard Watchtower Prophecies, rather they are Easy to See,Understand, and Prove. They are Backed by History,Exact Dates,Signs in the Sun & Moon & Stars, (Luke 21:25) ,Botanical Proofs, and Several Other clear Proofs.

No, they aren't backed by anything. This is just more woo with people seeing what they want to see and misunderstanding the word "proof".

16

Giant fruit in Canaan/TNS

by rebel8 in

jw
friends

ok bible scholars, do i have this right?.

jehoopla promised the israelites lots of great stuff in the promised land, but they didn't believe him so they sent spies to check it out.

they came back with fruit so large it had to be carried on a branch by 2 men.. from this, dubs believe they are going to have strawberries the size of king king's skull when they get to their own promised land (the new system).

Viviane

I studied Bio-dynamics(Some believe it's pseudo science or witch craft)

It is.

Rudulf Steiner is probably considered insane by chemical ag majors with his ancient rituals trying to impregnate Earth's soil back to a state of richness cotton and tobacco destroyed, their clueless how our environment is.

Insane? Probably not. But he was a mystic trying in vain to use mysticism and science together and promoting senseless woo.

If the Universal Consciousness decided to make things big by turning up the Earths productive powers, it's not far from imagination.

Nonsensical woo.

People ask us to believe Life sprouted from Nothingness

No one is asking anyone to believe that.

130

Atheist Miracles

by Perry in

jw
friends

i reworded a variation of a common critique of atheists to my own liking.

no, i do not hate atheists, i love them!

they keep me from getting bored.

Viviane

My opinion is that they are fully immersed in living, but say "No, i am convinced there is no creator, and there is no "(yet") likely.

When you insist on telling people what their opinion is...

pinning down some atheist's convictions is like trying to nail pudding to the wall, So I am not waiting for an 'atheist's miracle' to be proved wrong on that.

... rather than letting them speak for themselves, I can see why you would have trouble understanding.

IMHO if you daily look at the grand spectacle of existence, AND the more you know about how it all works, the work involved, the more you could at least put a "possible" in the concept of a deist originating worker.

Once you decide evidence isn't going to be used, anything becomes "possible". What does that have to do with you not understanding what atheist think while simultaneously trying to claim what they think?

99

Golden Rule: Pure Garbage?

by willmarite in

on another thread a poster made the comment that the golden rule was garbage.

she said it was arrogant and made assumptions.. i didn't want to derail that thread so i started another wondering if this is a common thought about this belief on this forum.

i guess i naively thought the value of doing to others as you want them to do to you was generally accepted as positive.. i understand people have different opinions of jesus as a person but i don't want to get into that here.

Viviane

More utter nonsense on this thread. I am not surprised though xx

See example ^^^^

99

Golden Rule: Pure Garbage?

by willmarite in

on another thread a poster made the comment that the golden rule was garbage.

she said it was arrogant and made assumptions.. i didn't want to derail that thread so i started another wondering if this is a common thought about this belief on this forum.

i guess i naively thought the value of doing to others as you want them to do to you was generally accepted as positive.. i understand people have different opinions of jesus as a person but i don't want to get into that here.

Viviane

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is a rule of conduct, not action. It doesn't pertain to offering people food or things you like. It is more a reverse idea, as Buddhism teaches

Nope, A does not equal !A. They are different things.

do not do to others what you yourself don't like (which was spoken and practiced well before Jesus' time). For instance: I don't want you to spit on me, so I won't spit on you. Not, I like to get slapped for laughs, so let me slap you.

Not what the golden rule says,

99

Golden Rule: Pure Garbage?

by willmarite in

on another thread a poster made the comment that the golden rule was garbage.

she said it was arrogant and made assumptions.. i didn't want to derail that thread so i started another wondering if this is a common thought about this belief on this forum.

i guess i naively thought the value of doing to others as you want them to do to you was generally accepted as positive.. i understand people have different opinions of jesus as a person but i don't want to get into that here.

Viviane

Seriously, Viviane ... lighten up

You're fascinated with pretending to know things about me, it seems. Makes me wonder what you dream about that you don't post.

99

Golden Rule: Pure Garbage?

by willmarite in

on another thread a poster made the comment that the golden rule was garbage.

she said it was arrogant and made assumptions.. i didn't want to derail that thread so i started another wondering if this is a common thought about this belief on this forum.

i guess i naively thought the value of doing to others as you want them to do to you was generally accepted as positive.. i understand people have different opinions of jesus as a person but i don't want to get into that here.

Viviane

Semantics are always annoying.

Why do you hate juice?