Dear Anyone who might be reading this from Bethel:
First of all, I am a "brother" in the congregation. I'm not going to meetings, nor am I following your unwritten rules - but I am not DF or DA.
There are two articles in the June 15, 2003 Watchtower that you should be ASHAMED OF.
The first article is on Pope Alexander VI.
Here, the article bashes the Pope (whom by the way, I don't think deserves anything less).
However, the article talks about everything from him living in luxury, affairs and other bad stuff he's done.
And then the article brings out, (paraphrasing) "Well, if this guy is so bad, what does it tell about the religion."
Shame on you, Bethel.
How dare you write an article bashing another religious leader?
Any mention of Judge Rutherford, and his alcoholism, his living in luxury, Beth Sarim, never going out in field service, his luxury cars PAID FOR by hard working followers - and what answer do we get???
He's an imperfect man and Jehovah is using imperfect people and it is UNFAIR to speak about someone like that.
Does not the same rule apply to the Catholic Church?
Believe me, I am no fan of the Catholic Chuch, but you can't have it both ways.
Next time, someone says something about Rutherford, HOW DARE YOU say ANYTHING in defense except for, he is a man who was bad and we should be ASHAMED of him for what he has done.
Is this not the same that you ask of the Catholic Church?
ARTICLE TWO is the one on the back cover.
It was titled "Simply a Custom or Bribery."
Without going into detail, the Watchtower is binding up Heavy Loads on their followers.
The article tries to tie in a giving of a gift with bribery.
The point is, Jesus did not make a law on bribery. But he did cover it with one principle - that we should love our neighbor.
A person who is a Christian can determine for themselves what is appopriate or note. How DARE you impose on "Jesus the Living Christs" ability to show each of his followers what is and is not appropriate.
The hypocrisy in this is that NOW, the Watchtower imposes this "NEW UNWRITTEN RULE" about determining what exactly IS and IS NOT a bribe - even though Jesus NEVER condemned giving a bride. It's just that neither HE OR HIS FATHER WOULD ACCEPT ONE.
I'm not defending BRIBES - I'm just saying it's NOT A RULE.
But hypocrisy here is that - what did the Society do when it signed up for the UN's NGO???
Even if it was for a "Library Card," is this not compromising principles and "offering a bride" to get something in return?
I find these two articles APPAULING and indefensible from your standpoint.
As a BROTHER in the congregation - I am TEACHING the Society that you are WRONG to have published this article.
By the way, if you CAN'T defend the actions of writing this article, you will probably attack me - a "BROTHER" since I'm not going to meetings and field service, etc. etc. etc.
But just so you know, the points are vaild and if you attack me personally - it would be no different that when the Pharasee's attacted the blind man - "YOU WERE ALL TOGETHER BORN IN SIN AND YET YOU ARE TEACHING US???"
Confucious