This is unbelievable! Theocratic warfare with the courts?
Elder states that JW's do NOT shun: (Listen to his weak definition of shunning)
Elder lies about the custody packet:
YouTube - Elder lies about shunning and custody packet
by Soldier77 32 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
-
agonus
Apparently the brother is not aware that watchtower.org does indeed use the word "shunning" in an article about, er, shunning.
-
-
Yan Bibiyan
If I am not mistaken, this very farce happened at the custody hearing of our own "alamb".
Don't you want to reach into the screen and sucker punch the Mfer?
-
-
-
-
wannabefree
Apparently he felt the following applied ....
*** w09 6/15 p. 17 pars. 6-7 Speak Truth With Your Neighbor ***
Does being truthful with others mean that we must disclose every detail to whoever asks us a question? Not necessarily. While on earth, Jesus demonstrated that some people are undeserving of a direct answer or of certain information. When hypocritical religious leaders asked him by what power or authority he performed signs and miracles, Jesus said: “I will ask you one question. You answer me, and I will also tell you by what authority I do these things.” When the scribes and older men were unwilling to give an answer, Jesus said: “Neither am I telling you by what authority I do these things.” (Mark 11:27-33) He did not feel obligated to answer the question in view of their corrupt practices and faithless example. (Matt. 12:10-13; 23:27, 28) Similarly today, Jehovah’s people need to be on guard against apostates and other wicked men who use trickery or cunning for selfish purposes.—Matt. 10:16; Eph. 4:14.
Paul likewise indicated that some people may not be entitled to receive a full or complete answer. He said that “gossipers and meddlers in other people’s affairs” are “talking of things they ought not.” (1 Tim. 5:13) Yes, those who pry into the affairs of others or those who cannot be trusted to keep a confidence may find that others are reluctant to share personal information with them.
-